[sf-lug] SF-LUG.INFO: Re: And then there were 5: SFLUG.NET, SFLUG.COM, SFLUG, ORG, SF-LUG.COM, SF-LUG.ORG: Re: SFLUG.COM Re: SFLUG.[...] Re: SFLUG.org

[Michael Paoli]

Once upon a time, at least for a while, we even had
SF-LUG.INFO 8-O

$ sed -ne '/^From  
/,/^$/{/^[Dd][Aa][Tt][Ee]:/H;/^[Ss][Uu][Bb][Jj][Ee][Cc][Tt]:  
.*[Ss][Ff]-[Ll][Uu][Gg].[Ii][Nn][Ff][Oo]/H;/^$/{x;/[Ss][Ff]-[Ll][Uu][Gg].[Ii][Nn][Ff][Oo]/p;s/.*//;x;};}'  
sf-lug.mbox

Date: Sat, 02 Jan 2016 20:22:38 -0800
Subject: [sf-lug] How sf-lug.info ended up on the Network Solutions /

Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2016 22:16:26 -0800
Subject: Re: [sf-lug] How sf-lug.info ended up on the Network Solutions /

Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2016 23:39:21 -0700
Subject: [sf-lug] Bye-bye sf-lug.info.,

Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2016 08:35:05 -0700
Subject: Re: [sf-lug] Bye-bye sf-lug.info.,

Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2016 12:12:16 -0700
Subject: Re: [sf-lug] Bye-bye sf-lug.info.,

Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2016 22:55:46 -0700
Subject: Re: [sf-lug] Bye-bye sf-lug.info.,
$

So ... we had SF-LUG.INFO over range of about:
2015-09-28T20:01:47Z--2016-09-28T20:01:47Z

http://linuxmafia.com/pipermail/sf-lug/2016q1/011612.html
http://linuxmafia.com/pipermail/sf-lug/2016q3/012267.html
http://linuxmafia.com/pipermail/sf-lug/2016q3/012268.html
http://linuxmafia.com/pipermail/sf-lug/2016q3/012269.html
http://linuxmafia.com/pipermail/sf-lug/2016q4/012289.html

> From: jim <jim at well.com>
> Subject: Re: [sf-lug] And then there were 5: SFLUG.NET, SFLUG.COM,  
> SFLUG, ORG, SF-LUG.COM, SF-LUG.ORG: Re: SFLUG.COM Re: SFLUG.[...]  
> Re: SFLUG.org
> Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2019 18:41:37 -0400

>
> My understanding is that the .NET domain
> is for entities that are providing network
> services to the internet; if so, then .NET
> is inappropriate for a LUG.
>
>
> On 4/13/19 6:32 PM, Michael Paoli wrote:
>> Okay. :-)
>> That sounds like a "no" to SF-LUG.NET.
>> I'd generally think 5 is (more than) adequate.
>> We have, in I believe reverse chronological:
>> SFLUG.NET
>> SFLUG.COM
>> SFLUG.ORG
>> SF-LUG.COM
>> SF-LUG.ORG
>>
>>> From: jim <jim at well.com>
>>> Subject: Re: [sf-lug] And then there were 5: SFLUG.NET, SFLUG.COM,  
>>> SFLUG, ORG, SF-LUG.COM, SF-LUG.ORG: Re: SFLUG.COM Re: SFLUG.[...]  
>>> Re: SFLUG.org
>>> Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2019 18:16:17 -0400
>>
>>>
>>> "we" used to own SF-LUG.NET but later
>>> (several years ago) tho't better of it.
>>>
>>>
>>> On 4/13/19 3:31 AM, Michael Paoli wrote:
>>>> Uhm, are we done adding domains for a while now, or ... are we  
>>>> gonna pick up
>>>> yet more?  SF-LUG.NET also seems available, but I don't know that Jim
>>>> specifically suggested that ... nor up to how many domains he's willing
>>>> to be reimbursing folks for.
>>>> http://linuxmafia.com/pipermail/sf-lug/2019q2/013999.html
>>>> Sounds like we've already (slightly) more than covered the domains Jim was
>>>> specifically referencing.
>>>>
>>>> Anyway, master now available for not only sflug.org.
>>>> but also now sflug.com. and sflug.net.:
>>>> ns1.sf-lug.org.:
>>>> 198.144.194.238
>>>> 2001:470:1f04:19e::2
>>>> Not sure where the slaves may be in the process.
>>>> Rick - if you want to coordinate with Al, you do also have access to
>>>> edit those zone masters:
>>>> balug-sf-lug-v2.balug.org
>>>> User rick may run the following commands on balug-sf-lug-v2:
>>>>     (root) sudoedit /etc/bind/master/sflug.org
>>>>     (root) /usr/sbin/rndc reload sflug.org
>>>>     (root) /usr/sbin/rndc notify sflug.org
>>>>     (root) sudoedit /etc/bind/master/sflug.com
>>>>     (root) /usr/sbin/rndc reload sflug.com
>>>>     (root) /usr/sbin/rndc notify sflug.com
>>>>     (root) sudoedit /etc/bind/master/sflug.net
>>>>     (root) /usr/sbin/rndc reload sflug.net
>>>>     (root) /usr/sbin/rndc notify sflug.net
>>>> E.g. if Al wants to provide additional slave(s) - and maybe we don't
>>>> want to "pester" Aaron to add slave(s) for yet 2 more domains.
>>>> I was also thinking we might want to (also) use puck.nether.net.
>>>> for slave services on some of these domains.
>>>>
>>>> Note also: Webserver knows about sflug.org, but thus far knows nothing
>>>> about sflug.com nor sflug.net.
>>>> Also DNSSEC ... the zones are set up for that ... for the newer ones,
>>>> notably sflug.com and sflug.net - we'll want to wait a bit before
>>>> putting in the (DS) delegation data for that - notably TTLs - want any
>>>> negative caching, etc. to first expire, lest we bust DNSSEC by putting
>>>> it in "too fast".
>>>> Anyway, it's set up with BIND9's in-line signing - so serials served by
>>>> DNS may be slightly ahead of what's in master zone files,
>>>> and one should use seconds since the epoch - that's how I have bind
>>>> configured to sign 'em.  The masters also generally have handy bit 'o
>>>> comment around that: date +%s
>>>> With GNU date, that'll get 'ya seconds since the epoch.
>>>>
>>>>> From: Al <awsflug at sunnyside.com>
>>>>> Subject: Re: [sf-lug] SFLUG.COM Re: SFLUG.[...] Re: SFLUG.org
>>>>> Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2019 08:00:22 -0700
>>>>
>>>>> FYI I've set sflug.{org,net,com} into a group.
>>>>>
>>>>> On 4/12/2019 07:47, Michael Paoli wrote:
>>>>>> Rick - thanks on the offers.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Added to the "queue" ... but my queue overfloweth, and it will never
>>>>>> /all/ get done.  I'll likely pick it up sometime after SFLUG.ORG
>>>>>> has actually been delegated and/or after when I've gotten some
>>>>>> higher priority BerkeleyLUG.com tasks moved further along.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In the meantime, I don't see any particular need to rush on  
>>>>>> SFLUG.COM ...
>>>>>> it's not like something used significantly - or even at all - by
>>>>>> SF-LUG suddenly broke and needs fixin', or there's been some great
>>>>>> need to SFLUG.COM operational for SF-LUG.  Anyway, shall get around
>>>>>> to it, ... just may take a bit (later this month?  next month?).
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> From: "Rick Moen" <rick at linuxmafia.com>
>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [sf-lug] SFLUG.COM Re: SFLUG.[...] Re: SFLUG.org
>>>>>>> Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2019 23:23:50 -0700
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Quoting Michael Paoli (Michael.Paoli at cal.berkeley.edu):
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> And ... I'm guestimating Al has snapped up SFLUG.COM.
>>>>>>> [...]
>>>>>>>> Yep:
>>>>>>>> Registrant Name: Al Whaley
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Well, same secondary DNS offer is on the plate:  Let me know when/if
>>>>>>> ns1.linuxmafia.com and ns1.svlug.org can AXFR it, and I'll set that up
>>>>>>> in a flash.  Assuming you want.