[sf-lug] And then there were 5: SFLUG.NET, SFLUG.COM, SFLUG, ORG, SF-LUG.COM, SF-LUG.ORG: Re: SFLUG.COM Re: SFLUG.[...] Re: SFLUG.org
Rick Moen
rick at linuxmafia.com
Sun Apr 14 01:00:40 PDT 2019
- Previous message: [sf-lug] And then there were 5: SFLUG.NET, SFLUG.COM, SFLUG, ORG, SF-LUG.COM, SF-LUG.ORG: Re: SFLUG.COM Re: SFLUG.[...] Re: SFLUG.org
- Next message: [sf-lug] SF-LUG.INFO: Re: And then there were 5: SFLUG.NET, SFLUG.COM, SFLUG, ORG, SF-LUG.COM, SF-LUG.ORG: Re: SFLUG.COM Re: SFLUG.[...] Re: SFLUG.org
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
Quoting Jim Stockford (jim at well.com):
> My understanding is that the .NET domain
> is for entities that are providing network
> services to the internet;
That was true by unenforced social convention until about 1994, but not
since then.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.net
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Generic_top-level_domain
- Previous message: [sf-lug] And then there were 5: SFLUG.NET, SFLUG.COM, SFLUG, ORG, SF-LUG.COM, SF-LUG.ORG: Re: SFLUG.COM Re: SFLUG.[...] Re: SFLUG.org
- Next message: [sf-lug] SF-LUG.INFO: Re: And then there were 5: SFLUG.NET, SFLUG.COM, SFLUG, ORG, SF-LUG.COM, SF-LUG.ORG: Re: SFLUG.COM Re: SFLUG.[...] Re: SFLUG.org
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
More information about the sf-lug
mailing list