[sf-lug] DNS slaves wanted

[Al Whaley]

More specifically:
ns0.sunnyside.com
ns1.sunnyside.com

On 9/10/2019 08:08, Al Whaley wrote:
> I'm willing to second these LUGs.
>
>
> On 9/10/2019 01:05, Michael Paoli wrote:
>> Rick - thanks - alas, would like to get some additional on these:
>> FQDN=balug.org. authority:
>> balug.org.              86400   IN      NS      ns1.balug.org.
>> balug.org.              86400   IN      NS ns1.linuxmafia.com.
>> balug.org.              86400   IN      NS      ns1.svlug.org.
>> balug.org.              86400   IN      NS      puck.nether.net.
>> FQDN=berkeleylug.com. authority:
>> berkeleylug.com.        172800  IN      NS ns0.berkeleylug.com.
>> berkeleylug.com.        172800  IN      NS ns1.linuxmafia.com.
>> berkeleylug.com.        172800  IN      NS      ns1.svlug.org.
>> berkeleylug.com.        172800  IN      NS      puck.nether.net.
>> FQDN=berkeleylug.org. authority:
>> berkeleylug.org.        86400   IN      NS ns0.berkeleylug.org.
>> berkeleylug.org.        86400   IN      NS ns1.linuxmafia.com.
>> berkeleylug.org.        86400   IN      NS      ns1.svlug.org.
>> berkeleylug.org.        86400   IN      NS      puck.nether.net.
>>
>> Can/could - "temporarily" drop those domains to 3 NS servers.
>> But having 4 or 5 (or max of about 7) nameservers would be preferable.
>>
>> I may ask on other (more) relevant LUG list(s) too ... but I'll probably
>> wait a bit, see what response(s) I get from this first.
>> And yes, I know, he.net also offers free DNS slave services ... 
>> believe I
>> may have had similar issue(s) there and/or other issues.  I'd been
>> using them before - on at least some stuff - no longer have 'em
>> on anything of mine or that I manage DNS for ... and probably with
>> good reason(s) - though I don't recall the specific(s).
>>
>> And yes, among NS servers I presently use (including slaves), I believe
>> puck.nether.net is the only one that's quite untimely about updating
>> when NOTIFY is sent (it likely ignores - seems to typically take
>> somewhere in the range of 5 to 10 minutes or more to update ... quite
>> the pain when one has a fair handful of records to add, and needs to
>> complete and verify each before proceeding to next record).
>>
>>> From: "Rick Moen" <rick at linuxmafia.com>
>>> Subject: Re: [sf-lug] Got domains? (sf-lug.{net, com} ...?) ... DNS 
>>> slaves ...
>>> Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2019 00:10:13 -0700
>>
>>> Quoting Michael Paoli (Michael.Paoli at cal.berkeley.edu):
>>>
>>>> Well, ... suppose I could set up DNS master & http[s] redirects ...
>>>> "again" in the case of sf-lug.com ... and
>>>> "new" in the case of sf-lug.net
>>>> Wanna offer DNS slaves for such?
>>>
>>> As you might expect, I will gladly make the usual pair,
>>> ns1.linuxmafia.com and ns1.svlug.org, available.  Arrangeable
>>> in the usual way.
>>>
>>> My two do take timely action upon receipt of DNS NOTIFY, last I 
>>> checked.
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> sf-lug mailing list
>> sf-lug at linuxmafia.com
>> http://linuxmafia.com/mailman/listinfo/sf-lug
>> SF-LUG is at http://www.sf-lug.org/ 
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> sf-lug mailing list
> sf-lug at linuxmafia.com
> http://linuxmafia.com/mailman/listinfo/sf-lug
> SF-LUG is at http://www.sf-lug.org/ 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://linuxmafia.com/pipermail/sf-lug/attachments/20190910/00b19b2c/attachment.html>