[sf-lug] DNS slaves wanted

[Al Whaley]

I'm willing to second these LUGs.


On 9/10/2019 01:05, Michael Paoli wrote:
> Rick - thanks - alas, would like to get some additional on these:
> FQDN=balug.org. authority:
> balug.org.              86400   IN      NS      ns1.balug.org.
> balug.org.              86400   IN      NS ns1.linuxmafia.com.
> balug.org.              86400   IN      NS      ns1.svlug.org.
> balug.org.              86400   IN      NS      puck.nether.net.
> FQDN=berkeleylug.com. authority:
> berkeleylug.com.        172800  IN      NS ns0.berkeleylug.com.
> berkeleylug.com.        172800  IN      NS ns1.linuxmafia.com.
> berkeleylug.com.        172800  IN      NS      ns1.svlug.org.
> berkeleylug.com.        172800  IN      NS      puck.nether.net.
> FQDN=berkeleylug.org. authority:
> berkeleylug.org.        86400   IN      NS ns0.berkeleylug.org.
> berkeleylug.org.        86400   IN      NS ns1.linuxmafia.com.
> berkeleylug.org.        86400   IN      NS      ns1.svlug.org.
> berkeleylug.org.        86400   IN      NS      puck.nether.net.
>
> Can/could - "temporarily" drop those domains to 3 NS servers.
> But having 4 or 5 (or max of about 7) nameservers would be preferable.
>
> I may ask on other (more) relevant LUG list(s) too ... but I'll probably
> wait a bit, see what response(s) I get from this first.
> And yes, I know, he.net also offers free DNS slave services ... believe I
> may have had similar issue(s) there and/or other issues.  I'd been
> using them before - on at least some stuff - no longer have 'em
> on anything of mine or that I manage DNS for ... and probably with
> good reason(s) - though I don't recall the specific(s).
>
> And yes, among NS servers I presently use (including slaves), I believe
> puck.nether.net is the only one that's quite untimely about updating
> when NOTIFY is sent (it likely ignores - seems to typically take
> somewhere in the range of 5 to 10 minutes or more to update ... quite
> the pain when one has a fair handful of records to add, and needs to
> complete and verify each before proceeding to next record).
>
>> From: "Rick Moen" <rick at linuxmafia.com>
>> Subject: Re: [sf-lug] Got domains? (sf-lug.{net, com} ...?) ... DNS 
>> slaves ...
>> Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2019 00:10:13 -0700
>
>> Quoting Michael Paoli (Michael.Paoli at cal.berkeley.edu):
>>
>>> Well, ... suppose I could set up DNS master & http[s] redirects ...
>>> "again" in the case of sf-lug.com ... and
>>> "new" in the case of sf-lug.net
>>> Wanna offer DNS slaves for such?
>>
>> As you might expect, I will gladly make the usual pair,
>> ns1.linuxmafia.com and ns1.svlug.org, available.  Arrangeable
>> in the usual way.
>>
>> My two do take timely action upon receipt of DNS NOTIFY, last I checked.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> sf-lug mailing list
> sf-lug at linuxmafia.com
> http://linuxmafia.com/mailman/listinfo/sf-lug
> SF-LUG is at http://www.sf-lug.org/