[sf-lug] DNS slaves wanted

[Michael Paoli]

Al,

Thanks, I'll follow-up with you on those OFF-LIST -
as they're not SF-LUG domains.

I'm guestimaging having my bits of it done sometime between now and
end of next week (no shortage of other stuff goin' on too - including
even other [L]UG stuff).

Thanks.

> From: "Al Whaley" <awsflug at sunnyside.com>
> Subject: Re: [sf-lug] DNS slaves wanted
> Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2019 08:12:27 -0700

> More specifically:
> ns0.sunnyside.com
> ns1.sunnyside.com
>
> On 9/10/2019 08:08, Al Whaley wrote:
>> I'm willing to second these LUGs.
>>
>>
>> On 9/10/2019 01:05, Michael Paoli wrote:
>>> Rick - thanks - alas, would like to get some additional on these:
>>> FQDN=balug.org. authority:
>>> balug.org.              86400   IN      NS      ns1.balug.org.
>>> balug.org.              86400   IN      NS ns1.linuxmafia.com.
>>> balug.org.              86400   IN      NS      ns1.svlug.org.
>>> balug.org.              86400   IN      NS      puck.nether.net.
>>> FQDN=berkeleylug.com. authority:
>>> berkeleylug.com.        172800  IN      NS ns0.berkeleylug.com.
>>> berkeleylug.com.        172800  IN      NS ns1.linuxmafia.com.
>>> berkeleylug.com.        172800  IN      NS      ns1.svlug.org.
>>> berkeleylug.com.        172800  IN      NS      puck.nether.net.
>>> FQDN=berkeleylug.org. authority:
>>> berkeleylug.org.        86400   IN      NS ns0.berkeleylug.org.
>>> berkeleylug.org.        86400   IN      NS ns1.linuxmafia.com.
>>> berkeleylug.org.        86400   IN      NS      ns1.svlug.org.
>>> berkeleylug.org.        86400   IN      NS      puck.nether.net.
>>>
>>> Can/could - "temporarily" drop those domains to 3 NS servers.
>>> But having 4 or 5 (or max of about 7) nameservers would be preferable.
>>>
>>> I may ask on other (more) relevant LUG list(s) too ... but I'll probably
>>> wait a bit, see what response(s) I get from this first.
>>> And yes, I know, he.net also offers free DNS slave services ... believe I
>>> may have had similar issue(s) there and/or other issues.  I'd been
>>> using them before - on at least some stuff - no longer have 'em
>>> on anything of mine or that I manage DNS for ... and probably with
>>> good reason(s) - though I don't recall the specific(s).
>>>
>>> And yes, among NS servers I presently use (including slaves), I believe
>>> puck.nether.net is the only one that's quite untimely about updating
>>> when NOTIFY is sent (it likely ignores - seems to typically take
>>> somewhere in the range of 5 to 10 minutes or more to update ... quite
>>> the pain when one has a fair handful of records to add, and needs to
>>> complete and verify each before proceeding to next record).
>>>
>>>> From: "Rick Moen" <rick at linuxmafia.com>
>>>> Subject: Re: [sf-lug] Got domains? (sf-lug.{net, com} ...?) ...  
>>>> DNS slaves ...
>>>> Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2019 00:10:13 -0700
>>>
>>>> Quoting Michael Paoli (Michael.Paoli at cal.berkeley.edu):
>>>>
>>>>> Well, ... suppose I could set up DNS master & http[s] redirects ...
>>>>> "again" in the case of sf-lug.com ... and
>>>>> "new" in the case of sf-lug.net
>>>>> Wanna offer DNS slaves for such?
>>>>
>>>> As you might expect, I will gladly make the usual pair,
>>>> ns1.linuxmafia.com and ns1.svlug.org, available.  Arrangeable
>>>> in the usual way.
>>>>
>>>> My two do take timely action upon receipt of DNS NOTIFY, last I checked.