[sf-lug] Got domains? (sf-lug.{net, com} ...?) ... DNS slaves ...

Al Whaley awsflug at sunnyside.com
Sun Sep 8 20:27:30 PDT 2019


It's not my impression that anyone in the actual sf-lug meeting group 
care all that much, so I suppose we could set these
other domains up or we could for now just ignore them.
I'm certainly willing to slave DNS for them or other domains.

On 9/8/2019 17:47, Michael Paoli wrote:
> Well, ... suppose I could set up DNS master & http[s] redirects ...
> "again" in the case of sf-lug.com ... and
> "new" in the case of sf-lug.net
> Wanna offer DNS slaves for such?
>
> ... or someone(s) else could do all that and set up suitable
> redirects, ... sf-lug.org thus far still being the canonical 'n
> all that.
>
> Let me know how you'd like to proceed.
>
> Also, while I'm thinking about DNS slaves, ... looking/hoping for
> some that are more responsive to NOTIFY events than puck.nether.net.
> Great that puck.nether.net is free and quite available, and basically
> self-serve to set up, but becomes rather annoying when I'm doing
> DNS verifications for SSL certs, and I'm trying to get all the relevant
> records into authoritative DNS in sufficiently timely manner. Also a
> pain when the back-ends of it are effectively "hidden", and I may see
> most current S/N from its public IPs one moment, and somewhat older
> zone serial #s and data later from same IP(s) ... so makes it harder
> to know when it's fully "given up" the older data (short of any
> guarantees on DNS TTLs themselves ... but I've got rather long
> time on the negative caching, so I don't want a "miss" when things first
> check for those (unique random) DNS entries).
>
>> From: "Al Whaley" <awsflug at sunnyside.com>
>> Subject: Re: Got domains? (sf-lug.{net,com} ...?)
>> Date: Sun, 8 Sep 2019 08:17:16 -0700
>
>> Michael,
>> Guilty.
>> Probably unnecessary, but what the heck.
>> Let me know if you have any DNSSEC entries.
>> Al
>>
>> On 9/7/2019 21:39, Michael Paoli wrote:
>>> Hmmm, got domains?
>>>
>>> I notice (and somebody else had noticed) ...
>>> $ whois sf-lug.net | fgrep Date:
>>>   Updated Date: 2019-09-03T23:38:29Z
>>>   Creation Date: 2019-09-03T23:38:28Z
>>>   Registry Expiry Date: 2020-09-03T23:38:28Z
>>> Updated Date: 2019-09-03T23:38:29Z
>>> Creation Date: 2019-09-03T23:38:28Z
>>> Registrar Registration Expiration Date: 2020-09-03T23:38:28Z
>>> $
>>>
>>> $ whois sf-lug.com | fgrep Date:
>>>   Updated Date: 2019-09-07T21:52:41Z
>>>   Creation Date: 2019-09-07T18:09:17Z
>>>   Registry Expiry Date: 2020-09-07T18:09:17Z
>>> Updated Date: 2019-09-07T21:52:40Z
>>> Creation Date: 2019-09-07T18:09:17Z
>>> Registrar Registration Expiration Date: 2020-09-07T18:09:17Z
>>> $
>>>
>>> references/excerpts:
>>> whois(1)
>>> https://www.balug.org/wiki/doku.php?id=sf-lug:resources_etc
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://linuxmafia.com/pipermail/sf-lug/attachments/20190908/48f02882/attachment.html>


More information about the sf-lug mailing list