[sf-lug] And then there were 5: SFLUG.NET, SFLUG.COM, SFLUG, ORG, SF-LUG.COM, SF-LUG.ORG: Re: SFLUG.COM Re: SFLUG.[...] Re: SFLUG.org

[Michael Paoli]

Okay.  :-)
That sounds like a "no" to SF-LUG.NET.
I'd generally think 5 is (more than) adequate.
We have, in I believe reverse chronological:
SFLUG.NET
SFLUG.COM
SFLUG.ORG
SF-LUG.COM
SF-LUG.ORG

> From: jim <jim at well.com>
> Subject: Re: [sf-lug] And then there were 5: SFLUG.NET, SFLUG.COM,  
> SFLUG, ORG, SF-LUG.COM, SF-LUG.ORG: Re: SFLUG.COM Re: SFLUG.[...]  
> Re: SFLUG.org
> Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2019 18:16:17 -0400

>
> "we" used to own SF-LUG.NET but later
> (several years ago) tho't better of it.
>
>
> On 4/13/19 3:31 AM, Michael Paoli wrote:
>> Uhm, are we done adding domains for a while now, or ... are we gonna pick up
>> yet more?  SF-LUG.NET also seems available, but I don't know that Jim
>> specifically suggested that ... nor up to how many domains he's willing
>> to be reimbursing folks for.
>> http://linuxmafia.com/pipermail/sf-lug/2019q2/013999.html
>> Sounds like we've already (slightly) more than covered the domains Jim was
>> specifically referencing.
>>
>> Anyway, master now available for not only sflug.org.
>> but also now sflug.com. and sflug.net.:
>> ns1.sf-lug.org.:
>> 198.144.194.238
>> 2001:470:1f04:19e::2
>> Not sure where the slaves may be in the process.
>> Rick - if you want to coordinate with Al, you do also have access to
>> edit those zone masters:
>> balug-sf-lug-v2.balug.org
>> User rick may run the following commands on balug-sf-lug-v2:
>>     (root) sudoedit /etc/bind/master/sflug.org
>>     (root) /usr/sbin/rndc reload sflug.org
>>     (root) /usr/sbin/rndc notify sflug.org
>>     (root) sudoedit /etc/bind/master/sflug.com
>>     (root) /usr/sbin/rndc reload sflug.com
>>     (root) /usr/sbin/rndc notify sflug.com
>>     (root) sudoedit /etc/bind/master/sflug.net
>>     (root) /usr/sbin/rndc reload sflug.net
>>     (root) /usr/sbin/rndc notify sflug.net
>> E.g. if Al wants to provide additional slave(s) - and maybe we don't
>> want to "pester" Aaron to add slave(s) for yet 2 more domains.
>> I was also thinking we might want to (also) use puck.nether.net.
>> for slave services on some of these domains.
>>
>> Note also: Webserver knows about sflug.org, but thus far knows nothing
>> about sflug.com nor sflug.net.
>> Also DNSSEC ... the zones are set up for that ... for the newer ones,
>> notably sflug.com and sflug.net - we'll want to wait a bit before
>> putting in the (DS) delegation data for that - notably TTLs - want any
>> negative caching, etc. to first expire, lest we bust DNSSEC by putting
>> it in "too fast".
>> Anyway, it's set up with BIND9's in-line signing - so serials served by
>> DNS may be slightly ahead of what's in master zone files,
>> and one should use seconds since the epoch - that's how I have bind
>> configured to sign 'em.  The masters also generally have handy bit 'o
>> comment around that: date +%s
>> With GNU date, that'll get 'ya seconds since the epoch.
>>
>>> From: Al <awsflug at sunnyside.com>
>>> Subject: Re: [sf-lug] SFLUG.COM Re: SFLUG.[...] Re: SFLUG.org
>>> Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2019 08:00:22 -0700
>>
>>> FYI I've set sflug.{org,net,com} into a group.
>>>
>>> On 4/12/2019 07:47, Michael Paoli wrote:
>>>> Rick - thanks on the offers.
>>>>
>>>> Added to the "queue" ... but my queue overfloweth, and it will never
>>>> /all/ get done.  I'll likely pick it up sometime after SFLUG.ORG
>>>> has actually been delegated and/or after when I've gotten some
>>>> higher priority BerkeleyLUG.com tasks moved further along.
>>>>
>>>> In the meantime, I don't see any particular need to rush on SFLUG.COM ...
>>>> it's not like something used significantly - or even at all - by
>>>> SF-LUG suddenly broke and needs fixin', or there's been some great
>>>> need to SFLUG.COM operational for SF-LUG.  Anyway, shall get around
>>>> to it, ... just may take a bit (later this month?  next month?).
>>>>
>>>>> From: "Rick Moen" <rick at linuxmafia.com>
>>>>> Subject: Re: [sf-lug] SFLUG.COM Re: SFLUG.[...] Re: SFLUG.org
>>>>> Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2019 23:23:50 -0700
>>>>
>>>>> Quoting Michael Paoli (Michael.Paoli at cal.berkeley.edu):
>>>>>
>>>>>> And ... I'm guestimating Al has snapped up SFLUG.COM.
>>>>> [...]
>>>>>> Yep:
>>>>>> Registrant Name: Al Whaley
>>>>>
>>>>> Well, same secondary DNS offer is on the plate:  Let me know when/if
>>>>> ns1.linuxmafia.com and ns1.svlug.org can AXFR it, and I'll set that up
>>>>> in a flash.  Assuming you want.
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> sf-lug mailing list
>> sf-lug at linuxmafia.com
>> http://linuxmafia.com/mailman/listinfo/sf-lug
>> SF-LUG is at http://www.sf-lug.org/
>
> _______________________________________________
> sf-lug mailing list
> sf-lug at linuxmafia.com
> http://linuxmafia.com/mailman/listinfo/sf-lug
> SF-LUG is at http://www.sf-lug.org/