[sf-lug] And then there were 5: SFLUG.NET, SFLUG.COM, SFLUG, ORG, SF-LUG.COM, SF-LUG.ORG: Re: SFLUG.COM Re: SFLUG.[...] Re: SFLUG.org
Rick Moen
rick at linuxmafia.com
Sat Apr 13 15:27:16 PDT 2019
- Previous message: [sf-lug] And then there were 5: SFLUG.NET, SFLUG.COM, SFLUG, ORG, SF-LUG.COM, SF-LUG.ORG: Re: SFLUG.COM Re: SFLUG.[...] Re: SFLUG.org
- Next message: [sf-lug] And then there were 5: SFLUG.NET, SFLUG.COM, SFLUG, ORG, SF-LUG.COM, SF-LUG.ORG: Re: SFLUG.COM Re: SFLUG.[...] Re: SFLUG.org
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
Quoting Jim Stockford (jim at well.com):
> "we" used to own SF-LUG.NET but later
> (several years ago) tho't better of it.
Are you referring to yourself in the plural, Jim? <grin>
(Mark Twain had a joke that 'the editorial "we" should be used only by
kings, editors, and people with the tapeworm.')
--
Cheers, There's no theorem like Bayes's Theorem, like no theorem we know.
Rick Moen Everything about it is appealing, everything about it is a wow.
rick at linux Let out all that a-priori feeling, you've been concealing,
mafia.com right up to now. -- G.E.P. Box (w/apologies to Irving Berlin)
- Previous message: [sf-lug] And then there were 5: SFLUG.NET, SFLUG.COM, SFLUG, ORG, SF-LUG.COM, SF-LUG.ORG: Re: SFLUG.COM Re: SFLUG.[...] Re: SFLUG.org
- Next message: [sf-lug] And then there were 5: SFLUG.NET, SFLUG.COM, SFLUG, ORG, SF-LUG.COM, SF-LUG.ORG: Re: SFLUG.COM Re: SFLUG.[...] Re: SFLUG.org
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
More information about the sf-lug
mailing list