[sf-lug] ANALYSYS--EXPLANATION Re: request for help re ssh -- sshd login failure

[jim]

Thank you, I'll look at it. I know box
administration somewhat but pretty much
ignorant about networking.



On 02/10/2016 03:16 PM, maestro wrote:
> jim,
> you may want to have a wee look @ this site and some links off of it...
> there is a specific 'netstat' command section as well and of course 
> the others...
>
> <https://dougvitale.wordpress.com/2011/12/21/deprecated-linux-networking-commands-and-their-replacements/>
>
>
> message ends.
> ______________
>
> On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 12:36 AM, Asheesh Laroia <asheesh at sandstorm.io 
> <mailto:asheesh at sandstorm.io>> wrote:
>
>     I have experienced the same difficulty reading these replies from
>     Jim and also was concerned about creating offense. Jim, I hope
>     that you can make your replies more readable! Until then I will
>     continue to attempt to read them, but it's rather difficult. You
>     can get a sense of how difficult by looking at the archived mail:
>     http://linuxmafia.com/pipermail/sf-lug/2016q1/011676.html
>
>     On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 12:18 AM, Rick Moen <rick at linuxmafia.com
>     <mailto:rick at linuxmafia.com>> wrote:
>
>         Quoting Jim Stockford (jim at well.com <mailto:jim at well.com>):
>
>         > I try to explain each command in my comments, interspersed
>         below.
>
>         I appreciate the effort you go do, in constructing that
>         interspersion:
>         I'm guesssing you are doing that entirely manually, which
>         implies a
>         semi-heroic editing effort.
>
>         I see you use Mozilla Thunderbird.  Back when I used
>         Thunderbird for
>         corporate mail, I found that it did decent quoting
>         automatically but
>         that its internal text editor was lacking.  I used a Thunderbrd
>         extension that permitted use of any arbitrary external editor,
>         and then
>         just used vim as that editor.  These days, there is an all-in-one
>         solution called Muttator, which you can find here:
>         http://www.vimperator.org/muttator
>
>         FWIW, though I greatly appreciate the work you put into manual
>         construction of replies, please consider using automated tools
>         such as
>         Muttator, which would probably greately reduce the amount of
>         work for
>         you _and_ render your repsonse messages more legible.  Alas, I
>         find that
>         the lack of line breaks in your replies and your extremely
>         unclear and
>         eccentric style of quoting to be very difficult to parse at
>         all, Jim.
>
>         I certainly didn't want to create offencce, and so haven't
>         been saying
>         anything about this, but IMO it's a significant deterrent
>         against even
>         trying to parse your replies.
>
>
>         _______________________________________________
>         sf-lug mailing list
>         sf-lug at linuxmafia.com <mailto:sf-lug at linuxmafia.com>
>         http://linuxmafia.com/mailman/listinfo/sf-lug
>         Information about SF-LUG is at http://www.sf-lug.org/
>
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     sf-lug mailing list
>     sf-lug at linuxmafia.com <mailto:sf-lug at linuxmafia.com>
>     http://linuxmafia.com/mailman/listinfo/sf-lug
>     Information about SF-LUG is at http://www.sf-lug.org/
>
>
>
>
> -- 
>
> *~the quieter you become, the more you are able to hear...*
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> sf-lug mailing list
> sf-lug at linuxmafia.com
> http://linuxmafia.com/mailman/listinfo/sf-lug
> Information about SF-LUG is at http://www.sf-lug.org/

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://linuxmafia.com/pipermail/sf-lug/attachments/20160210/0edfe37b/attachment.html>