[sf-lug] ANALYSYS--EXPLANATION Re: request for help re ssh -- sshd login failure
maestro
maestro415 at gmail.com
Wed Feb 10 07:16:37 PST 2016
jim,
you may want to have a wee look @ this site and some links off of it...
there is a specific 'netstat' command section as well and of course the
others...
<
https://dougvitale.wordpress.com/2011/12/21/deprecated-linux-networking-commands-and-their-replacements/
>
message ends.
______________
On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 12:36 AM, Asheesh Laroia <asheesh at sandstorm.io>
wrote:
> I have experienced the same difficulty reading these replies from Jim and
> also was concerned about creating offense. Jim, I hope that you can make
> your replies more readable! Until then I will continue to attempt to read
> them, but it's rather difficult. You can get a sense of how difficult by
> looking at the archived mail:
> http://linuxmafia.com/pipermail/sf-lug/2016q1/011676.html
>
> On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 12:18 AM, Rick Moen <rick at linuxmafia.com> wrote:
>
>> Quoting Jim Stockford (jim at well.com):
>>
>> > I try to explain each command in my comments, interspersed below.
>>
>> I appreciate the effort you go do, in constructing that interspersion:
>> I'm guesssing you are doing that entirely manually, which implies a
>> semi-heroic editing effort.
>>
>> I see you use Mozilla Thunderbird. Back when I used Thunderbird for
>> corporate mail, I found that it did decent quoting automatically but
>> that its internal text editor was lacking. I used a Thunderbrd
>> extension that permitted use of any arbitrary external editor, and then
>> just used vim as that editor. These days, there is an all-in-one
>> solution called Muttator, which you can find here:
>> http://www.vimperator.org/muttator
>>
>> FWIW, though I greatly appreciate the work you put into manual
>> construction of replies, please consider using automated tools such as
>> Muttator, which would probably greately reduce the amount of work for
>> you _and_ render your repsonse messages more legible. Alas, I find that
>> the lack of line breaks in your replies and your extremely unclear and
>> eccentric style of quoting to be very difficult to parse at all, Jim.
>>
>> I certainly didn't want to create offencce, and so haven't been saying
>> anything about this, but IMO it's a significant deterrent against even
>> trying to parse your replies.
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> sf-lug mailing list
>> sf-lug at linuxmafia.com
>> http://linuxmafia.com/mailman/listinfo/sf-lug
>> Information about SF-LUG is at http://www.sf-lug.org/
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> sf-lug mailing list
> sf-lug at linuxmafia.com
> http://linuxmafia.com/mailman/listinfo/sf-lug
> Information about SF-LUG is at http://www.sf-lug.org/
>
--
*~the quieter you become, the more you are able to hear...*
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://linuxmafia.com/pipermail/sf-lug/attachments/20160210/b4174700/attachment.html>
More information about the sf-lug
mailing list