[sf-lug] sf-lug.{com,info} --> www.sf-lug.org (canonical)

[Daniel Gimpelevich]

On Sat, 2016-01-02 at 00:31 -0800, Rick Moen wrote:
> Quoting Daniel Gimpelevich (daniel at gimpelevich.san-francisco.ca.us):
> 
> > In previous discussions with Jim, he indicated that the use of
> > sf-lug.org for the mailing list in the future would be welcomed to
> the
> > exclusion of any other SMTP behavior, and you at that time said that
> > nothing in the MTA configuration prevented it.
> 
> That sounds _vaguely_ familiar (now that you mention it).  Only, I
> have
> no idea offhand what _specifically_ would make that so.  Probably I
> did
> some checking at the time, but can't remember.
> 
> Seems to me, you should test that assumption first, e.g., point
> example.com's domain's MX record at linuxmafia.com, send mail to
> 'rick at example.com', and make sure I get it.   (Substitute some real
> domain for example.com.)

Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently:

     danielg4@[REDACTED]

Technical details of permanent failure: 
Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the server
for the recipient domain [REDACTED] by linuxmafia.com.
[198.144.195.186].

The error that the other server returned was:
550 relay not permitted


----- Original message -----

DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gimpelevich-san-francisco-ca-us.20150623.gappssmtp.com;
s=20150623;
        h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type;
        bh=dM2nEK+I3FUCRrZxDwZIqXgVkpEe0GeGJcuqu86mocU=;
        b=RgPfKrc8dW1D2rFGgTuJ0zL9ISMVOaFJt6ndw2m
+sGUeZttYmaWQIrwNIhI2ENH//G

eM6xgcq67DzGJU1byHjB3uckEBHpnQOlzPKuOumFx6IbCutlEPFz2fYZ9XAHnuGq5jCa

tlNwvc5O3kRA1ovfsgv6uPCP5H5E5656utActc42nNjt67iJlJ2p5a2clb/8qaaEgd+i
         F4sg871FahT1cwHualXTpRUycRFtns3Wy4pM7sW
+EGUpijgCopUGpDDShjNhytbJIgsp
         q6PsKlu2gPuNehBWcOfyexiCTtDK6CuH/Fu818NoRGm7acqD+9rZYR6FeGnPN
+Pm8LiP
         OkPw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20130820;

h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to
         :content-type;
        bh=dM2nEK+I3FUCRrZxDwZIqXgVkpEe0GeGJcuqu86mocU=;
        b=Ftzi4TCWWTmuwJobOupCr+ALjTqOAIGSD
+5peLzBzJcvKa8QU6jgshpZrwXpkpMYD7
         ZLsnYBfg
+lhYcIfDTE4IRa/Ygy6RV1Zx9UUM8frbXnHHuw84JGE9wjKghBy9efZYNJuc
         PCW9RpmX/QKdb6Mqbxk
+bhGWvDgaz7vRDJY891A/CjBXpKdoxfnx2yl5O7rnQVigwEKn
         ftrFHrwSp0+RZHyiZXlhU2TN
+WWts/ADTTm6GbRXDSIRoq5bjZ7Ls/QCSPd3JzDTdyRn

gz5Jqli9QvtzNHVAUhj8Cy2Fn8OI9mfCNgGcX0RY4bGlOyzoserUSUtWKfrzmqb7RzO1
         LVag==
X-Gm-Message-State:
ALoCoQndsUo0n0vw1M8qSCEhNuYhoE4FuYZrbmLS5zgs7pWQtNcz//FOk7got0yQh1glNlhCuicJQBkcdAOvRM6o51BW3R4mLg==
X-Received: by 10.60.226.136 with SMTP id
rs8mr43039748oec.31.1451946769717;
 Mon, 04 Jan 2016 14:32:49 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.76.39.36 with HTTP; Mon, 4 Jan 2016 14:32:30 -0800 (PST)
From: Daniel Gimpelevich <daniel at gimpelevich.san-francisco.ca.us>
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2016 14:32:30 -0800
Message-ID: <CAFqr8
+nSLei=8a=6DhuxaT0amqDHm_ZSvM1hUAmeJSkKLKy4jg at mail.gmail.com>
Subject: test
To: danielg4@[REDACTED]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary=001a1136bc1c713194052889b307

test