[sf-lug] SF-LUG & BALUG: System OS upgrades *soon*(?) - volunteer(s)?

jim jim at systemateka.com
Mon Jan 23 22:18:25 PST 2012

    Say what you will; i say michael is expert, a 
whiz, even. 
    I say you are, too, and thanks for the recommend. 
I'm pondering. 

    Just in case it isn't clear to anyone, "vicki" 
is the hostname for the box per the base debian 
system. We used XEN to create two guest VM systems, 
one for SF-LUG.com and the other for BALUG. 

On Mon, 2012-01-23 at 17:19 -0800, Rick Moen wrote:
> I wrote:
> > Somebody obviously decided to commit this blunder as a deliberate policy
> > choice, possibly the 'expert Linux sys admin with a particularly good
> > set of best practices' you speak of?  ;->
> Quick, Sherman!  The Wayback Machine!
> http://linuxmafia.com/pipermail/sf-lug/2007q2/001406.html
> http://linuxmafia.com/pipermail/sf-lug/2007q2/001408.html
> In 2007, I cautioned Michael Paoli and others against their proposal to
> peg Debian to a named branch and explained why it was unwise.  Might
> want to work with the Debian administrative regime.  It turns out better.
> _______________________________________________
> sf-lug mailing list
> sf-lug at linuxmafia.com
> http://linuxmafia.com/mailman/listinfo/sf-lug
> Information about SF-LUG is at http://www.sf-lug.org/

More information about the sf-lug mailing list