[sf-lug] $199 Linspire Desktop at Sears
Charles N Wyble
charles at thewybles.com
Thu Jan 31 07:46:08 PST 2008
(Hey, it's Charles Wyble! He heads one of the LA Linux groups, and is
an well-known system engineer in the southland. Hi, Charles!)
[Charles N Wyble]
Thanks for the props :) Evidently my reputation precedes me :)
Quoting charles at thewybles.com (charles at thewybles.com):
> Check out freespire.
Yeah, sure, there _is_ Freespire (in two editions, one with some
proprietary stuff, mostly A/V codecs, and the other allegedly all open
source). The major attraction seems to be either inclusion or easy
post-installation fetching of MP3 support, DVD support, Windows Media 9
codec, some QuickTime, Sun Java, Macromedia Flash, RealPlayer 10, ATI
drivers, Nvidia drivers, sundry winmodem and WiFi drivers, Bitstream
fonts, etc.
[Charles N Wyble]
Well Ubuntu makes all that stuff easy to right? First time you
play media Ubuntu goes and grabs all the necessary codecs (or
a lot of them anyway). I find that the codec grabbing and installing
vlc seems to handle all my media playback needs.
Flash is easy enough to install when surfing to a site with FF.
Java has been a pain for me and has required manual setup. Perhaps
I am doing something wrong.
Also Nvidia and Broadcom drivers are easily fetched as well.
Dunno about fonts or modem drivers. Last modem I needed to support
was USB and worked out of the box.
So at the moment Freespire and Ubuntu Gutsy appear to be somewhat
evenly matched.
Last I heard, Freespire actually includes a really nasty
proprietary-software EULA that, among other things, makes clear that you
are specifically banned from even redistributing the CD contents! Maybe
even the allegedly all open source edition -- not sure.
[Charles N Wyble]
I am not aware of any evil EULA in the free edition.
Otherwise, Freespire is to Linspire approximately what Fedora is to RHEL.
[Charles N Wyble]
I have to disagree with you there. Freespire is a very mature and stable
product whereas Fedora is a platform for continuous integration and testing
and is in a constant state of flux. It has very recent apps with the
associated
bugs and features. :)
Whereas FreeSpire is Linspire without the proprietary stuff included. Also I
believe
It's based on Ubuntu. I don't know why Canonical and Linspire don't merge.
If they did
it would give Canonical a US presence and sales force/distribution channel.
I have played with FreeSpire and its pretty nice. I primarily use
Ubuntu and am typing this e-mail on a Vista laptop in Outlook. So... :)
More information about the sf-lug
mailing list