[conspire] We don't support Mozilla
Ross Bernheim
rossbernheim at speakeasy.net
Sun Apr 24 16:52:41 PDT 2005
On Apr 24, 2005, at 4:28 PM, Rick Moen wrote:
>> Wells probably went through a lot of this earlier. They seem much
>> better
>> now. One of the reasons that they check browsers is a security thing.
>
> Call me a cynic, but I interpret _that_ as a post-hoc excuse, rather
> than a reason. As you say:
>
>> However, given how insecure Explorer has been, I question their
>> definition of security. :-)>
>
> Moreover, checking for 128-bit SSL support logically requires only,
> well, checking for 128-bit SSL support. So, this is basically just a
> smokescreen best understood as "We simply decided to do Javascript
> vetting of a narrow list of pre-approved agent strings, but we know
> that
> sounds stupid, so we're pretending this is a security precaution".
>
> Remember, it only has to sound plausible enough that Alice doesn't
> investigate.
I remember that book, "Alice in Blunderland".
Ross
I answered the doorbell and a Jehovah's Witness said, "Can I talk to
you
about God?" I responded, "Sure, what would you like to know?"
More information about the conspire
mailing list