[sf-lug] SF-LUG web site updated (COVID-19)

[Michael Paoli]

SF-LUG web site has been updated.

You're welcome.

> From: "Michael Paoli" <Michael.Paoli at cal.berkeley.edu>
> Subject: [L]UGs & ...: Re: [conspire] Cabal & Covid19
> Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2020 00:22:23 -0700

>> From: Texx <texxgadget at gmail.com>
>> Subject: [conspire] Cabal & Covid19
>> Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2020 16:29:30 -0700
>
>> Im going to presume that April is also cancelled and probably May.
>>
>> I really wanted to come in March but I had a conflict, and I found out
>> afterwards that it had been
>> cancelled, so no biggie.
>
> Yes, generally best to presume in-person cancelled (and by legal order,
> if not common sense),
> until things are clearly stated otherwise.
>
> I also well indicate that (updated several days ago) on
> SF Bay Area Open Source/Linux Events
> https://www.google.com/calendar/embed?src=caj9iea2ol69b7n2uqdek4ocso%40group.calendar.google.com&ctz=America/Los_Angeles
>
> I've generally also covered that on the [L]UG web pages where I have
> edit access, and also so stated on relevant list(s) (at least if such
> wasn't already reasonably well stated there).
>
> Reminds me, still have a bit more 'o that to cover, but yeah, the in-person
> stuff for [L]UGs isn't happening, as not essential meetings, they're
> prohibited, as often/typically/potentially "too many" people, likewise
> prohibited, as typically not feasible to meet social distance requirements,
> prohibited, and also not feasible as most typically meeting locations,
> if still open at all, are typically now to-go/take-out only, and/or their
> hours/days may be greatly reduced.  Many typical group attendees, or
> persons at general meeting locations, often have individuals in
> high / much higher risk categories - so shouldn't be exposed to other
> persons (or as limited as feasible).  So, yeah, in-person [L]UG meetings,
> basically a no-go, for multiple reasons, for some fair while ... and probably
> more reasonable to presume "until further notice", as exactly when/how most
> of that will change, and when, is at this point still a relative unknown.