[sf-lug] Debian Project's up-to-date proposals re: init systems
aaronco36
aaronco36 at SDF.ORG
Tue Nov 19 13:22:28 PST 2019
Well, it turns out that some fairly-obvious systemd init supporters came
out with a bit of a sleight-of-hand runaround 'Proposal D Choice 4:
Support non-systemd systems, without blocking progress' in today's "Debian
Project General Resolution: Init Systems and systemd" [1]
Directly quoting from [1]:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
NON-INIT-RELATED DECLARATIVE SYSTEMD FACILITIES
9. systemd provides a variety of facilities besides daemon startup. For
example, creating system users or temporary directories. Current Debian
approaches are often based on debhelper scripts. In general more
declarative approaches are better. Where - systemd provides such facility
- a specification of the facility (or suitable subset) exists - the
facility is better than the other approaches available in Debian, for
example by being more declarative - it is reasonable to expect developers
of non-systemd systems including non-Linux systems to implement it -
including consideration of the amount of work involved the facility should
be documented in Debian Policy (by textual incorporation, not by reference
to an external document). The transition should be smooth for all users.
The non-systemd community should be given at least 6 months, preferably at
least 12 months, to develop their implementation. (The same goes for any
future enhancements.) If policy consensus cannot be reached on such a
facility, the Technical Committee should decide based on the project's
wishes as expressed in this GR.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
As I previously wrote in [2], there are still the Debian-based,
non-systemd distros MX Linux, antiX, Devuan GNU+Linux, etc, which one
hopes Ian Jackson and his Proposal D Seconds will not be able to get their
"declaratively approaching" grubby hands on in order to "enhance" and
subsequently disable/break :-\
-A
====================================================
References
====================================================
[1]https://www.debian.org/vote/2019/vote_002
[2]http://linuxmafia.com/pipermail/sf-lug/2019q4/014448.html
====================================================
aaronco36 at sdf.org
More information about the sf-lug
mailing list