[sf-lug] linuxmafia.com back online! :-) Re: SF-LUG webmasters & ... Re: linuxmafia.com offline(!?) (SF-LUG list, ...) Re: SF-LUG Mailing list - late AM Tue 10/23/18
Michael Paoli
Michael.Paoli at cal.berkeley.edu
Thu Oct 25 15:49:50 PDT 2018
And, nice to see linuxmafia.com back online! ... or more
precisely, Internet accessible and again having access to The Internet.
This:
Received: from shell1.rawbw.com ([198.144.192.42] ident=root)
by linuxmafia.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
(envelope-from <Michael.Paoli at cal.berkeley.edu>)
id 1gFnU6-0005dv-Dq; Thu, 25 Oct 2018 14:48:16 -0700
is from the first email following that that made it through to me,
so I'm presuming service was restored around or bit before:
Thu, 25 Oct 2018 14:48:16 -0700
(the backed up email / list mail doesn't necessarily dequeue in
and/or get delivered in FIFO order).
> From: "Michael Paoli" <Michael.Paoli at cal.berkeley.edu>
> To: aaronco36 <aaronco36 at SDF.ORG>, "Rick Moen" <rick at linuxmafia.com>,
> "Rick Moen" <rick at deirdre.net>, sf-lug at linuxmafia.com,
> "Jim Stockford" <jim at well.com>,
> "Kim Davalos" <kdavalos at sonic.net>,
> "Todd Hawley" <celticdm at gmail.com>,
> "Grant Bowman" <grantbow at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [sf-lug] SF-LUG webmasters & ... Re: linuxmafia.com
> offline(!?) (SF-LUG list, ...) Re: SF-LUG Mailing list - late AM Tue
> 10/23/18
> Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2018 08:02:46 -0700
> Well, ... I did hear that (at least) one of the five having
> suitable access (hint - and someone other than me),
> might make some suitable edits to the SF-LUG web home page
> making some mention of linuxmafia.com status, notably around /
> in connection with the SF-LUG list mention(s) on the SF-LUG home/main
> web page, this A.M. (US/Pacific), at least if linuxmafia.com
> continues to not be Internet accessible this A.M. (at least if/when
> they get around to it and rechecking status).
>
> Additional hints :-) ...:
> $ hostname --fqdn; ls -ld . index.php; pwd -P
> balug-sf-lug-v2.balug.org
> drwxrwsr-x 2 root sflugwww 4096 Mar 14 2018 .
> -rw-r--r-- 1 sflugwww sflugwww 3902 Jul 18 2016 index.php
> /var/www/www.sf-lug.org
> $ dig +noall +answer +nottl balug-sf-lug-v2.balug.org. A
> balug-sf-lug-v2.balug.org. AAAA
> balug-sf-lug-v2.balug.org. IN A 198.144.194.238
> balug-sf-lug-v2.balug.org. IN AAAA 2001:470:1f05:19e::2
> $ ip a s | egrep 'inet(|6) (198\.144\.194\.238|2001:470:1f05:19e::2)'
> inet 198.144.194.238/29 brd 198.144.194.239 scope global eth0
> inet6 2001:470:1f05:19e::2/64 scope global
> $
>
> Hmmmm... I wonder too, as/so long as it's still php ... could wee bit
> 'o php code automagically update relevant status change? "Of course"
> longer term is some crontab driven "static" web page, that would
> automagically update specific upcomming/current meeting date
> information ... but such a crontab job could likewise report
> status (or conditionally if list not Internet accessible) ...
> and maybe even for about how long such has persisted from earlier
> checks. Well, ... on step at a time (and time/priorities ...).
> In any case, I believe crontab driven static for SF-LUG web page
> has been on the agenda / wish/task list for quite a while (and
> fairly high up in the queue). And yep, ... 5 folks have the
> requisite access ... but I'm not planning to do that task myself
> (I do sufficient SF-LUG IT tasks as it is) ... so, hopin' one
> (or more) of the other 4 will eventually get around to it.
>
>> From: "Michael Paoli" <Michael.Paoli at cal.berkeley.edu>
>> Subject: SF-LUG webmasters & ... Re: linuxmafia.com offline(!?)
>> (SF-LUG list, ...) Re: SF-LUG Mailing list - late AM Tue 10/23/18
>> Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2018 10:49:34 -0700
>
>> Thanks Rick, for all the updates!
>>
>> And, for SF-LUG, in the meantime,
>> if anyone(s) wanted to (temporarily) update/alter the SF-LUG web site,
>> there are at least 4 persons, in addition to myself, that have the
>> requisite access to do so:
>>
>> # (for login in grantbow jstockford kdavalos thawley; do sudo -l -U
>> "$login" | sed -ne '/^User /p;/sflugwww/p'; done)
>> User grantbow may run the following commands on balug-sf-lug-v2:
>> (root) /bin/su - sflugwww
>> User jstockford may run the following commands on balug-sf-lug-v2:
>> (root) /bin/su - sflugwww
>> User kdavalos may run the following commands on balug-sf-lug-v2:
>> (root) /bin/su - sflugwww
>> User thawley may run the following commands on balug-sf-lug-v2:
>> (root) /bin/su - sflugwww
>> #
>>
>> And, for bit 'bout what it at current says on the web site about the
>> list & related:
>> $ lynx -dump https://www.sf-lug.org/ | egrep -i
>> '(^|[^a-zA-Z])list([^a-zA-Z]|$)|^ [15]\.'
>> Members are anyone belonging to the sf-lug mailing list. Anyone
>> interested in Linux may join the sf-lug mailing list: [1]sf-lug mail
>> list.
>> sf-lug mailing list. Postings should include the job title, salary
>> skills requirements list with company policies and benefits followed by
>> SF-LUG mailing list is supported courtesy of [5]linuxmafia.com.
>> 1. http://linuxmafia.com/mailman/listinfo/sf-lug
>> 5. http://linuxmafia.com/
>> $
>>
>>> From: "Michael Paoli" <Michael.Paoli at cal.berkeley.edu>
>>> Subject: linuxmafia.com offline(!?) (SF-LUG list, ...) Re: SF-LUG
>>> Mailing list - late AM Tue 10/23/18
>>> Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2018 17:23:49 -0700
>>
>>> Don't know for sure, but I'd guestimate it may likely be issue
>>> with ISP or routing.
>>>
>>> $ dig +noall +answer +nottl linuxmafia.com. A linuxmafia.com. AAAA
>>> linuxmafia.com. IN A 198.144.195.186
>>> $
>>> # traceroute -nT -m 10 -p 80 198.144.195.186
>>> traceroute to 198.144.195.186 (198.144.195.186), 10 hops max, 60
>>> byte packets
>>> 1 198.144.194.233 13.520 ms 15.674 ms 17.503 ms
>>> 2 * * *
>>> 3 * * *
>>> 4 * * *
>>> 5 * * *
>>> 6 * * *
>>> 7 * * *
>>> 8 * * *
>>> 9 * * *
>>> 10 * * *
>>> #
>>> I believe we're still both on same ISP, so likely issue within ISP,
>>> or some other dependency ... I think lines/circuits/routing have
>>> AT&T dependencies.
>>>
>>> # hostname
>>> balug-sf-lug-v2.balug.org
>>> # pwd -P
>>> /var/lib/named/etc/bind/master
>>> # fgrep -i ns1.linuxmafia.com sf-lug.org | fgrep @
>>> IN NS ns1.linuxmafia.com. ; 198.144.195.186
>>> Rick Moen rick at linuxmafia.com rick at deirdre.net 1-650-283-7902
>>> #
>>>
>>> I do also have relatively fresh backups of SF-LUG list (mbox) & roster:
>>>
>>> $ ls -ld sf-lug_roster/sf-lug_roster sf-lug.mbox/sf-lug.mbox
>>> -r--r--r-- 1 sflug sflug 72050877 Oct 18 21:31 sf-lug.mbox/sf-lug.mbox
>>> -r-------- 1 sflug sflug 9365 Oct 13 06:32 sf-lug_roster/sf-lug_roster
>>> $ stat sf-lug.mbox/sf-lug.mbox
>>> File: sf-lug.mbox/sf-lug.mbox
>>> Size: 72050877 Blocks: 140880 IO Block: 4096 regular file
>>> Device: fe03h/65027d Inode: 30232 Links: 1
>>> Access: (0444/-r--r--r--) Uid: (29774/ sflug) Gid: (29774/ sflug)
>>> Access: 2018-10-23 06:40:14.358531599 -0700
>>> Modify: 2018-10-18 21:31:01.000000000 -0700
>>> Change: 2018-10-23 06:40:14.622505200 -0700
>>> Birth: -
>>> $
>>>
>>> The mtimes may remain the same if there are no updates (no subsequent
>>> postings nor changes to roster membership).
>>>
>>> I'll update if I hear anything relevant and appropriate to add.
>>>
>>> # traceroute -n -m 10 198.144.195.186
>>> traceroute to 198.144.195.186 (198.144.195.186), 10 hops max, 60
>>> byte packets
>>> 1 198.144.194.233 111.819 ms 112.212 ms 112.450 ms
>>> 2 * * *
>>> 3 * * *
>>> 4 * * *
>>> 5 * * *
>>> 6 * * *
>>> 7 * * *
>>> 8 * * *
>>> 9 * * *
>>> 10 * * *
>>> #
>>>
>>> And thanks for noticing/mentioning! :-)
>>>
>>>> From: "Michael Paoli" <Michael.Paoli at cal.berkeley.edu>
>>>> Subject: Re: SF-LUG Mailing list - late AM Tue 10/23/18
>>>> Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2018 12:56:00 -0700
>>>
>>>> Confirmed ... at least to a first order approximation.
>>>>
>>>> I'll check further when I have time.
>>>>
>>>> I do also have alternative & out-of-band contact info. for Rick Moen.
>>>>
>>>> I should also have quite current backups of the sf-lug list data -
>>>> at least roster and archive, anyway.
>>>>
>>>>> From: aaronco36 <aaronco36 at SDF.ORG>
>>>>> Subject: SF-LUG Mailing list - late AM Tue 10/23/18
>>>>> Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2018 19:45:33 +0000 (UTC)
>>>>
>>>>> Hey there,
>>>>>
>>>>> Haven't run further diagnostic tests on this myself (yet!),
>>>>> however the SF-LUG mailing list
>>>>> http://linuxmafia.com/mailman/listinfo/sf-lug seems to be
>>>>> offline as of late this morning and so far this early afternoon.
>>>>> All I did was enter this exact complete mailman URL in my FF
>>>>> web-browser, and the page eventually times-out with this message:
>>>>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ quoting ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>>>> The connection has timed out
>>>>>
>>>>> The server at linuxmafia.com is taking too long to respond.
>>>>>
>>>>> * The site could be temporarily unavailable or too busy. Try
>>>>> again in a few moments.
>>>>> * If you are unable to load any pages, check your computers
>>>>> network connection.
>>>>> * If your computer or network is protected by a firewall or
>>>>> proxy, make sure that Firefox is permitted to access the Web.
>>>>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>>>>
>>>>> Probably doesn't help all that much, but a simple 'traceroute
>>>>> www.linuxmafia.com' reaches whatever firewall or other security
>>>>> measures that may be at rawbw.net (198.144.192.34).
>>>>> No, am *not* myself going to run diagnostics using DIG and/or
>>>>> Netmap on this!
>>>>> -A
>>>>>
>>>>> aaronco36 at sdf.org
More information about the sf-lug
mailing list