[sf-lug] Good domain name registrar

[jim]

Thank you. Very informative.



On 05/04/2015 01:57 AM, Rick Moen wrote:
> Quoting Jim Stockford (jim at well.com):
>
>> The meaning I had in mind was that the person who is most likely to be
>> persistent in a customer business should be the person who is the
>> registrant.  Another way of (attempting to) say it is that the owner
>> of the customer business should probably be the registrant and
>> certainly keep tabs on the person who ends up being the registrant.
> IMO, the Registrant should be the _business_, in the case of a
> corporation or partnership (or LLC, etc.) -- because that is in fact
> the 'person' that is persistant.  For a sole proprietorship,
> absolutely it should be the principal, not someone else.
>
> However, please note that Google, Inc. is fine with the Registrant being
> the 'Dns Admin' role, which is not any specific person at all.
> Likewise, Apple, Inc. has it be 'Domain Administrator', Facebook, Inc.
> has it be 'Domain Administrator', Oracle, Inc. has it be 'Domain
> Administrator', Adobe System, Inc. has it be 'Domain Administrator', and
> Cisco Technology, Inc. has it be 'Info Sec' at their respective
> corporations for their respective main corporate domains.  I really
> think there is no potential for trouble that a stiff letter from
> Corporate Legal wouldn't squash in a heartbeat.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> sf-lug mailing list
> sf-lug at linuxmafia.com
> http://linuxmafia.com/mailman/listinfo/sf-lug
> Information about SF-LUG is at http://www.sf-lug.org/
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://linuxmafia.com/pipermail/sf-lug/attachments/20150504/e6b11a56/attachment.html>