Fwd: Returned mail: see transcript for details
Alex Kleider
akleider at sonic.net
Wed Jan 21 18:47:11 PST 2015
Bobbie,
there seems to be a problem with one of the addresses on your list of
recipients.
"shane at faultymonk.org" to be specific.
cheers,
Alex
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Returned mail: see transcript for details
Date: 2015-01-21 18:44
From: Mail Delivery Subsystem <MAILER-DAEMON at c.mail.sonic.net>
To: <akleider at sonic.net>
The original message was received at Wed, 21 Jan 2015 18:43:40 -0800
from webmail.a.apps.sonic.net [64.142.109.105]
----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----
<charles-henri.gros at m4x.org>
(reason: 550 5.7.1 spam client software rule)
----- Transcript of session follows -----
... while talking to aspmx.l.google.com.:
>>> DATA
<<< 451-4.3.0 Multiple destination domains per transaction is
unsupported. Please
<<< 451 4.3.0 try again. gh4si10187318pbc.251 - gsmtp
<shane at faultymonk.org>... Deferred: 451-4.3.0 Multiple destination
domains per transaction is unsupported. Please
... while talking to mx2.polytechnique.org.:
>>> DATA
<<< 550 5.7.1 spam client software rule
554 5.0.0 Service unavailable
Reporting-MTA: dns; c.mail.sonic.net
Received-From-MTA: DNS; webmail.a.apps.sonic.net
Arrival-Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 18:43:40 -0800
Final-Recipient: RFC822; charles-henri.gros at m4x.org
Action: failed
Status: 5.7.1
Remote-MTA: DNS; mx2.polytechnique.org
Diagnostic-Code: SMTP; 550 5.7.1 spam client software rule
Last-Attempt-Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 18:43:58 -0800
Return-Path: <akleider at sonic.net>
Received: from webmail.sonic.net (webmail.a.apps.sonic.net
[64.142.109.105])
(authenticated bits=0)
by c.mail.sonic.net (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t0M2heG4029298;
Wed, 21 Jan 2015 18:43:40 -0800
Received: from 76-191-204-54.dsl.dynamic.sonic.net ([76.191.204.54])
by webmail.sonic.net
with HTTP (HTTP/1.1 POST); Wed, 21 Jan 2015 18:43:40 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8;
format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 18:43:40 -0800
From: Alex Kleider <akleider at sonic.net>
To: Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever at dslextreme.com>
Cc: jim <jim at well.com>, "John F. Strazzarino" <jstrazza at yahoo.com>,
Ken
Shaffer <Kenneth_C_Shaffer at comcast.net>,
maestro <maestro415 at gmail.com>, Jeff Bragg
<jackofnotrades at gmail.com>,
Michael Paoli
<Michael.Paoli at cal.berkeley.edu>,
Joseph Puig <jbpuig at sbcglobal.net>,
Christian Einfeldt <einfeldt at gmail.com>, Ola Peters
<ola at telmate.com>,
Bill
Kendrick <nbs at sonic.net>, jason stone <jasonstone at gmail.com>,
michael at michaelshiloh.com, Mikki <mikkimc at earthlink.net>,
Sameer Verma
<sverma at sfsu.edu>, Bill Hill <aropoika at gmail.com>,
Michael Rojas
<ledworldwide.solutions at gmail.com>, rick at deirdre.net,
Tom
<seameadowlake at gmail.com>,
Daniel G
<daniel at gimpelevich.san-francisco.ca.us>,
"marksobell at gmail.com >> Mark
Sobelll" <marksobell at gmail.com>,
hardy stevenson <bloonoise at gmail.com>,
Alison Chaiken <alchaiken at gmail.com>,
Shane Tzen <shane at faultymonk.org>, Mike Higashi
<mhigashi at gmail.com>,
Samir Faci <samir at esamir.com>, Ronald
Petty <ronald.petty at gmail.com>,
Charles-Henri Gros
<charles-henri.gros at m4x.org>
Subject: Re: SF-LUG - A CLEC is a CLEC is a CLEC
Organization: Bolinas
In-Reply-To: <54C046E4.4040102 at dslextreme.com>
References: <54C046E4.4040102 at dslextreme.com>
Message-ID: <92bea7ce338a1dc50fc7d1368b6939c4 at sonic.net>
User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/0.9.5
X-Sonic-Auth:
G+sh2wWPjpq4ANBcKdWd1LTLOmME1l1IAHEdXUmF0AUar3rqrFhQKvqK0yKMOoWO9P8tHrmdg2rEdiYUmcJOyPHrirsCpkORqEEUrLxREGs=
X-Sender: (akleider at sonic.net)
X-Sonic-CAuth:
UmFuZG9tSVbpjydUYaJtUNPV81D01ogrDCJbJeuQUjCz4tdOtfqmr4BK45EgwofkoPPJTMp4GtNeblxPNDV1uf6Y/QO9N5KL
X-Sonic-ID: C;qodkeeCh5BGgeqnrCx1YGw== M;Im9peeCh5BGgeqnrCx1YGw==
X-Spam-Flag: No
X-Sonic-Spam-Details: -2.8/5.0 by cerberusd
On 2015-01-21 16:40, Bobbie Sellers wrote:
> First entry on Google
>
> In the United States, a CLEC (competitive local exchange carrier) is a
> telephone company that competes with the already established local
> telephone business by providing its own network and switching.
>
> Not knowing was intolerable
>
> Bobbie
And it's own wiring system?
i.e. the line (twisted pair) that comes from the street to a residence,
or in one of my cases, a floating home.
More information about the sf-lug
mailing list