[sf-lug] RHEL Version Performance

[Samir Faci]

That's a really broad question.  I mean what I'm interested in doing with
my RH server would be completely different then what you might have in
mind.

There might be curve ball for example in their LAMP stack that might make
one version better then the other, but if you're using your servers for
mail servers.. you wouldn't really care about any of my numbers.

What exactly are you looking for?



On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 5:42 AM, Grant Bowman <grantbow at fedoraproject.org>
wrote:

> Hi everyone,
>
> Has anyone run any performance benchmarks of a patched RHEL 5.11 kernel
>  2.6.18-398  vs. RHEL 6.6 kernel 2.6.32-504 vs. a RHEL 7.0 kernel
> 3.10.0-123?
>
>     https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux#RHEL_5
>
> What things have changed in the kernel, libc or other libraries that might
> be important to corporate decision makers with budget authority?
>
> Thanks,
> Grant
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Ambassadors
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> sf-lug mailing list
> sf-lug at linuxmafia.com
> http://linuxmafia.com/mailman/listinfo/sf-lug
> Information about SF-LUG is at http://www.sf-lug.org/
>



-- 
Thank you
Samir Faci
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://linuxmafia.com/pipermail/sf-lug/attachments/20150211/917b15fd/attachment.html>