[sf-lug] sf-lug website?

[maestro]

very kewl rick...
thanks...


message ends.
________________

On Monday, July 14, 2014, Rick Moen <rick at linuxmafia.com> wrote:
> Quoting Christian Einfeldt (einfeldt at gmail.com):
>
>> I noticed that the sf lug website is down.  I went to sf-lug.com and
.org.
>> Any thoughts?
>
> Micro-tutorial follows that may facilitate deeper analysis than 'The Web
> site is down'.
>
>
> For any Web site to function and be reachable at a fully-qualified [DNS]
> domain name (aka 'FQDN') URL, the following constituent parts must all be
> working, and can be checked in order.
>
> 1.  Domain must be registered.  Check using 'whois'.*
> 2.  Authoritative nameservers must exist.  Check using 'whois'.
> 3.  Authoritative nameservers must resolve the domain, and in
>     particular the Web server's FQDN.  Check using 'dig'.
> 4.  Routing to the server must exist.  Check using 'ping', 'traceroute',
>     'tcptraceroute'.  (Each gives slightly different information.)
> 5.  Connectivity to the target server's TCP port 80**, the standard
>     server for HTTP, must work.  Check using dig or curl.
> 6.  If connected to validly and asked for the Web page, the Web
>     server must return the site HTML (as opposed to, say, a 404
>     Not Found response, 302 Permanently Moved response, etc.).
>     Check using - obviously - a Web browser, or a variety of other
>     things that can act like an HTTP client, including /usr/bin/telnet.
>
> If any of those items doesn't work, then the ones that follow don't
> matter because of fundamental failure at a lower level.
>
>
> Let's apply that list to sf-lug.com, then to sf-lug.org:
>
>
> sf-lug.org:
> -----------
> 1.  Registration.
>
> rmoen at borgia:~$ whois sf-lug.com
> [...]
> Domain Status: clientTransferProhibited
>    Updated Date: 04-jul-2014
>    Creation Date: 02-jul-2004
>    Expiration Date: 02-jul-2015
>
> In recent years registrars have been playing games with the vital
> 'Updated Date', 'Domain Status', and 'Expiration Date' field - among
> others.  Reading the rest of the whois entry attentively, it's obvious
> what happened.  July 2, 2014 was the expiration date - and the owner did
> _not_ renew.
>
> On July 2nd, the domain expired, and registrar Network Solutions
> promptly added a (bogus) additional year.  They also changed the
> displayed Registrant (owner) to omit the erstwhile owner - Jim
> Stockford, if memory serves - and show themselves in that role, and they
> changed the authoritatives nameservers from those of the erstwhile owner
> to their 'domain parking' nameservers at NS1.PENDINGRENEWALDELETION.COM
> and NS2.PENDINGRENEWALDELETION.COM.
>
> So:  Domain is currently 12 days past expiration.  Recovery prospects?
> See footnote http://linuxmafia.com/~rick/preventing-expiration.html#1
> Quoting:
>
>   In the first 40 days, the domain can still be renewed by just paying
>   the normal renewal. Some registrars will accept renewal money from
>   anyone; others won't.
>
> As noted, steps 2-6 are academic at present, since the domain's in
> limbo.  But y'all have until Monday, August 11, 2014 to recover at no
> more than the cost of regular renewal.  (That's 40 days from expiration.)
>
>
>
> sf-lug.org:
>
> 1.  Registration.
>
> rmoen at borgia:~$ whois sf-lug.org
> [...]
> Creation Date: 2004-07-02T21:17:47Z
> Updated Date: 2014-07-04T10:15:26Z
> Registry Expiry Date: 2015-07-02T21:17:47Z
> Domain Status: clientTransferProhibited
> Domain Status: autoRenewPeriod
>
>
> Gosh, same story.  Steps 2-6 omitted, ditto.
>
>
>
> Ancillary comment:  Network Solutions sucks.  (GoDaddy blows.)
> Lots of reasons, omitted here.
>
>
>
> * MS-Windows lacks this tool along with the equally essential DNS tools
> host and dig.  There's an open-source set of the three from Cygwin.
> MS-Windows people really ought to routinely install and use those
> instead of using Web-based whois and using the extremely buggy and
> antique nslookup tool instead of dig/host.
>
> 8* Rarely, a Web server may be configured to be reachable on a different
> port, most often 8080, thus the URL pattern http://www.example.com:8080/ .
>
> --
> Cheers,                           "So, a Degas painting walks into a
barre...."
> Rick Moen                                                 @behindyourback
> rick at linuxmafia.com
> McQ! (4x80)
>
> _______________________________________________
> sf-lug mailing list
> sf-lug at linuxmafia.com
> http://linuxmafia.com/mailman/listinfo/sf-lug
> Information about SF-LUG is at http://www.sf-lug.org/
>

-- 

*~the quieter you become, the more you are able to hear...*
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://linuxmafia.com/pipermail/sf-lug/attachments/20140714/7c58699c/attachment.html>