[sf-lug] directory tree organization question

[Ken Shaffer]

Or just duplicate the existing structure exactly, and sync them up now and
then with meld or rsync,.. if you're keeping the old laptop as a
backup/traveling machine.  If you're not keeping the old laptop, why not
duplicate what you have?
Ken

On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 2:57 PM, jim <jim at systemateka.com> wrote:

>
>    i have a number of directories, each with their
> subdirectory trees.
>    i just bought (and will very soon pick up) a new
> laptop from zareason (Terra HD).
>    i'm rethinking my directory structure and can't
> decide (it may not matter, but it may--i bet that
> someone figured it out in 1969):
>
> ----------------------------
> what i've got looks like this:
>
> this/sub-1/
> this/sub-2/
> this/sub-3/
>
> that/sub-a/
> that/sub-b/
>
> ----------------------------
> i can re-do things like so:
>
> this/sub-1/OLD
> this/sub-2/OLD
> this/sub-3/OLD
>
> that/sub-a/OLD
> that/sub-b/OLD
>
> ----------------------------
> or like so:
>
> this/sub-1/
> this/sub-2/
> this/sub-3/
>
> that/sub-a/
> that/sub-b/
>
> OLD/this/sub-1/
> OLD/this/sub-2/
> OLD/this/sub-3/
>
> OLD/that/sub-a/
> OLD/that/sub-b/
>
> ----------------------------
>
> i have no inclination either way. opinions?
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> sf-lug mailing list
> sf-lug at linuxmafia.com
> http://linuxmafia.com/mailman/listinfo/sf-lug
> Information about SF-LUG is at http://www.sf-lug.org/
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://linuxmafia.com/pipermail/sf-lug/attachments/20110307/d30e9e90/attachment.html>