[sf-lug] New Open Source Software Proposal
hinkle at cipafilter.com
Tue Mar 16 11:45:07 PDT 2010
Yea, it would be very neat. I could probably do it if I made some simple rules. Like, replicates x times per day or something like that. I think for the normal use case it would be cake, for something like a live database it would be very difficult. Maybe I just put a big warning in the readme that says "DON'T RUN YOUR LIVE DATABASE ON THIS FILESYSTEM OR ELSE". :)
From: sf-lug-bounces at linuxmafia.com [mailto:sf-lug-bounces at linuxmafia.com] On Behalf Of David Rosenstrauch
Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2010 1:42 PM
To: sf-lug at linuxmafia.com
Subject: Re: [sf-lug] New Open Source Software Proposal
I guess I was largely thinking of the Fuse idea as a means to enable the
tool to do browsing of the remote FS. (And making a Fuse FS out of it
would be an elegant way of accomplishing it, since then the remote data
could be read/written with standard Unix userspace tools.)
But I guess as long as the tool provided some means to perform that
functionality, it doesn't really matter that much how it's done.
On 03/16/2010 02:36 PM, David Hinkle wrote:
> It is a neat idea, I just think it's more of a step 2 than a step 1.
> A replication technology like rsync is one thing, people expect to
> cron it every night and have simple expectations for it.
> People expect a lot more out of a filesystem. Automatic replication
> is a much bigger bear.
> I just think I'd like to solve the simple problem first, the bigger
> problem would be very neat to solve but I think it would take much
> more work.
> -----Original Message----- From: sf-lug-bounces at linuxmafia.com
> [mailto:sf-lug-bounces at linuxmafia.com] On Behalf Of David
> Rosenstrauch Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2010 1:33 PM To:
> sf-lug at linuxmafia.com Subject: Re: [sf-lug] New Open Source Software
> On 03/16/2010 12:47 PM, David Hinkle wrote:
>> I would totally build the functionality into the tool to download
>> subdirectories, specific files, and to produce a file listing.
> Just wondering what you think of the idea of this being implemented
> as a Fuse FS? Does that make any sense to you or do you think it's
> totally infeasible?
sf-lug mailing list
sf-lug at linuxmafia.com
Information about SF-LUG is at http://www.sf-lug.org/
More information about the sf-lug