[sf-lug] sf-lug policies -- please vote
amro at shaketech.com
Wed Feb 20 15:12:17 PST 2008
On 2/16/08, Nathan Hoover <nathan at foo-o-rama.com> wrote:
> -1, no reason not to name a salary range. Lack of salary range is a cancer
> on job listings of any kind.
> On 2/16/08, jim stockford <jim at well.com> wrote:
> > every once in a rare while the topic of sf-lug policies
> > comes up, and here it is again. this time it's the policy
> > for job postings.
> > the current policy is to allow job postings if the
> > postings include job title, city location, and some
> > indication of salary (at least a lowest figure) along with
> > a brief and to-the-point description of the job and skills
> > required and company benefits and contact info (with
> > a proscription against hyperbole).
> > the basis for this is to present appropriate job
> > opportunities that we might otherwise miss but to
> > avoid subjecting the list to "bottom feeders" and
> > cheapskate employers.
> > someone at google wants to place job postings, but
> > her manager won't allow any salary info. the default is
> > to disallow this posting. the reason for raising review
> > of this policy is that google is an established, local
> > workplace, and can reasonably be considered not a
> > bottom-feeder or cheapskate employer.
> > please vote:
> > +1 means change policy to allow known job postings of
> > known good employers regardless of salary information.
> > -1 means do not change the policy.
> > after summing votes, a positive number will effect a
> > change in policy. a zero or negative number will have
> > the effect that policy remains as is (and the google
> > submissions and those similar will not be posted to our
> > email list).
> > _______________________________________________
> > sf-lug mailing list
> > sf-lug at linuxmafia.com
> > http://linuxmafia.com/mailman/listinfo/sf-lug
> sf-lug mailing list
> sf-lug at linuxmafia.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the sf-lug