[sf-lug] Status of new sf-lug.com box? Need Help

[Jason Turner]

jim stockford wrote:
> [...]
>     getting a second and even third involved person
> to take on a more formal role would be a very good
> thing for me and us.
>
>
>   
While allergic to "formal"ity, I'll again put my hat in for the 
appropriate level of support.  There's no rush that *I* know of to get 
this done -- other than the timely resolution of the fine suggestions 
outlined below.  And I have a suggestion or two there.

Someone's suggestion of getting together over the box at a CABAL 
installfest still sounds good to me.  Perhaps we can firm plans up at 
the next meeting.

> On Oct 28, 2007, at 10:43 PM, Rick Moen wrote:
>
>   
>> Just as a reminder, though, you really should consider:
>>
>> 1.  Not having your zonefile e-mail contact be in-domain (within the
>> sf-lug.com domain).
>>
>> 2.  Changing either the technical or administrative contact in your
>> domain record to be someone with a different telephone number and 
>> e-mail
>> address, in order that there not be a single point of failure on
>> contacting the domain, e.g., for domain renewal notices.  In other
>> words, "whois sf-lug.com" should always display at least two distinct
>> points of contact for the domain.
>>
>> 3.  Keeping the domain registered for more than a year in advance,
>> instead of less than a year.
>>
>> 4.  As mentioned, accepting ASAP that guy's kind offer of providing a
>> third nameserver.
>>
>> I've said each of these things a few times.  I'm going to stop 
>> repeating
>> them, at this point, but that doesn't make them less than quite serious
>> suggestions.
>>
>>     
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> sf-lug mailing list
> sf-lug at linuxmafia.com
> http://linuxmafia.com/mailman/listinfo/sf-lug
>