[sf-lug] Diskless Workstation/Fat Client
tom at greenleaftech.net
Tue Oct 2 15:25:31 PDT 2007
On Tue, 2007-10-02 at 15:13 -0700, Christian Einfeldt wrote:
> On 10/2/07, Tom Haddon <tom at greenleaftech.net> wrote:
> Hi Folks,
> For the HVLC project, we're looking into the possibility of
> doing a fat
> client/diskless workstation setup. Essentially what this means
> is the
> local hardware resources of the clients are being used, but
> filesystem is centrally managed/updated.
> This is exactly what we are doing in our public middle school project.
> Here's what I have learned from doing so:
> 1) your users will always demand more resource intensive apps than
> you planned. So plan for that. heh
> 2) To anticipate item # 1) above, you should try to max out the RAM,
> the NICs, the eth cables, the switches and the CPUs in the server and
> the clients within the budget you have avalable. You want to make
> sure you have a GB network.
> I would actually love to have anyone who is interested come over to
> see how our network is configured. We are using Edubuntu.
> Coincidentally, if you are looking for vendors to supply your needs, I
> can make three recommendations: Steve Hargadon of
> TechnologyRescue.com or Earl Malmrose of Zareason.com, or Yochai Gal
> of Techcollective.com. All of them have helped out with thin client
> technology at our school, and they are all passionate, knowledgeable,
> and reliable.
I'm a little confused - are you using Thin Client or Fat Client/Diskless
Workstation? We're specifically trying to avoid Thin Client because of
the hardware setup we have...
mailto:tom at greenleaftech.net
More information about the sf-lug