[sf-lug] need advice: GPL licensing question
jim at well.com
Thu Sep 13 17:27:53 PDT 2007
side track: the various governmental entities (fed, state,
etc.) have a lot of code in the public domain, yes?
On Sep 13, 2007, at 5:05 PM, Rick Moen wrote:
> Quoting jim stockford (jim at well.com):
>> well, my intention was to present the concept that an XML file might
>> express an idea with the inference that the XML file might therefore
>> be copyrightable.
> Um, what makes something copyrightable is it being...
> o in fixed form
> o existing within one of the statutory eight areas
> o creative (having "expressive elements"),
> o substantive, and
> o not created directly by the Federal government or an agency.
> The fact that it "expresses an idea" is neither here nor there: _Any_
> creative work expresses an idea, right? (Come to think of it, even
> purely functional works do, too.)
>  Anything the Federal government or one of its agencies directly
> creates gains zero copyright title: Such works pass directly into the
> public domain, as if their terms of copyright had expired. However,
> nothing prevents a Federal agency from hiring an outside entity to
> create something, and then receive the resulting copyright title by
> terms of the contract.
> sf-lug mailing list
> sf-lug at linuxmafia.com
More information about the sf-lug