[sf-lug] need advice: GPL licensing question
Rick Moen
rick at linuxmafia.com
Thu Sep 13 17:05:00 PDT 2007
Quoting jim stockford (jim at well.com):
> well, my intention was to present the concept that an XML file might
> express an idea with the inference that the XML file might therefore
> be copyrightable.
Um, what makes something copyrightable is it being...
o in fixed form
o existing within one of the statutory eight areas
o creative (having "expressive elements"),
o substantive, and
o not created directly by the Federal government or an agency.[1]
The fact that it "expresses an idea" is neither here nor there: _Any_
creative work expresses an idea, right? (Come to think of it, even
purely functional works do, too.)
[1] Anything the Federal government or one of its agencies directly
creates gains zero copyright title: Such works pass directly into the
public domain, as if their terms of copyright had expired. However,
nothing prevents a Federal agency from hiring an outside entity to
create something, and then receive the resulting copyright title by
terms of the contract.
More information about the sf-lug
mailing list