[sf-lug] Fwd: Question

[jim stockford]

just to be clear:
    copying all names means everyone gets the
job postings (what the posters want) and each
person must manually opt off the list.
    opt-in means nobody is on the job posting list
(which defeats the purpose of having a list) and
each person has to remember and bother and
sign up properly, etc., which most won't do, I
surmise.
    Either way, a bunch of crap may or may not be
said to worm its way on the list--depending on
the description of job-posting.
    I think job-posting, despite its bottom-feeding
nature, adds something (positive) to our
discussions.



On Jul 25, 2006, at 2:54 PM, vincent polite wrote:

> I think I somehow originally missed the original posting. I think the 
> opt-in method is better. Avoid a bunch of crap worming its way on to 
> the list.
>
> jim stockford <jim at well.com> wrote:
>
> just the kind of response i like, thank you.
> others (add or subtract 1 to/from sarah)?
>
> On Jul 25, 2006, at 2:34 PM, Sarah Mei wrote:
>
> > +1 for a separate jobs list, but I'd suggest that we let folks opt in
> > rather than copying the list over.
> >
> > Sarah
> >
> >>> Some Linux user groups have a list to announce jobs. Does the SF 
> LUG
> >>> have such a list?
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > sf-lug mailing list
> > sf-lug at linuxmafia.com
> > http://linuxmafia.com/mailman/listinfo/sf-lug
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> sf-lug mailing list
> sf-lug at linuxmafia.com
> http://linuxmafia.com/mailman/listinfo/sf-lug
>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: text/enriched
Size: 1564 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://linuxmafia.com/pipermail/sf-lug/attachments/20060725/26634b40/attachment.bin>