[sf-lug] Fwd: Question
jim at well.com
Tue Jul 25 15:10:10 PDT 2006
just to be clear:
copying all names means everyone gets the
job postings (what the posters want) and each
person must manually opt off the list.
opt-in means nobody is on the job posting list
(which defeats the purpose of having a list) and
each person has to remember and bother and
sign up properly, etc., which most won't do, I
Either way, a bunch of crap may or may not be
said to worm its way on the list--depending on
the description of job-posting.
I think job-posting, despite its bottom-feeding
nature, adds something (positive) to our
On Jul 25, 2006, at 2:54 PM, vincent polite wrote:
> I think I somehow originally missed the original posting. I think the
> opt-in method is better. Avoid a bunch of crap worming its way on to
> the list.
> jim stockford <jim at well.com> wrote:
> just the kind of response i like, thank you.
> others (add or subtract 1 to/from sarah)?
> On Jul 25, 2006, at 2:34 PM, Sarah Mei wrote:
> > +1 for a separate jobs list, but I'd suggest that we let folks opt in
> > rather than copying the list over.
> > Sarah
> >>> Some Linux user groups have a list to announce jobs. Does the SF
> >>> have such a list?
> > _______________________________________________
> > sf-lug mailing list
> > sf-lug at linuxmafia.com
> > http://linuxmafia.com/mailman/listinfo/sf-lug
> sf-lug mailing list
> sf-lug at linuxmafia.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 1564 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the sf-lug