[conspire] VNC through a secure channel
ruben at mrbrklyn.com
Sun Aug 24 18:22:49 PDT 2008
On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 07:26:19PM -0400, Jeff Kinz wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 07:02:10PM -0400, Ruben Safir wrote:
> > ssh is too sluggish for say 10,000 users and I'm talking through the
> 10,000 simultaneous users is probably worth mentioning in the initial
> > browser. The security needs to be inside VNC.
> or around it, end to end.
> curious though, why not just make sure the web pages are served only via
> https, which gives you end to end encryption?
> I'm sure you have a reason, its just not evident.
I'd like to eventually sell appliances that don't need a browser
I'm not certain VNC in the browser would go through an SSL browser
layer, anyway. I thought it opened it's own pipes.
http://www.mrbrklyn.com - Interesting Stuff
http://www.nylxs.com - Leadership Development in Free Software
So many immigrant groups have swept through our town that Brooklyn, like Atlantis, reaches mythological proportions in the mind of the world - RI Safir 1998
http://fairuse.nylxs.com DRM is THEFT - We are the STAKEHOLDERS - RI Safir 2002
"Yeah - I write Free Software...so SUE ME"
"The tremendous problem we face is that we are becoming sharecroppers to our own cultural heritage -- we need the ability to participate in our own society."
"> I'm an engineer. I choose the best tool for the job, politics be damned.<
You must be a stupid engineer then, because politcs and technology have been attached at the hip since the 1st dynasty in Ancient Egypt. I guess you missed that one."
© Copyright for the Digital Millennium
More information about the conspire