Image automation or not, with 3-5 people and as many installation discs (as well as a clear plan about what each machine will need) this could easily be accomplished in less than a day, barring really exotic configuration needs.
<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 6/19/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">Romel Jacinto</b> <<a href="mailto:email@example.com">firstname.lastname@example.org</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
On Tue, June 19, 2007 14:56, jim stockford wrote:<br>><br>> there may be reasons to build some machines<br>> uniquely (resource differences, user needs...),<br>> just a tho't.<br><br><br>Jim,<br><br>You're absolutely right.
<br>That's why I'm hoping that there is an evaluation and written agreement up<br>front between the installers and the end-users about what is needed and<br>wanted on the machines.<br><br>My idea about imaging was just that; I figured that we've all done
<br>individual installations ad nauseum for ourselves or for friends and<br>family, so I thought this might be a neat learning opportunity. If this<br>instance isn't appropriate for imaging, then that's ok with me too.
<br><br>--<br>Romel<br><br><br>_______________________________________________<br>sf-lug mailing list<br><a href="mailto:email@example.com">firstname.lastname@example.org</a><br><a href="http://linuxmafia.com/mailman/listinfo/sf-lug">