[sf-lug] And then there were 5: SFLUG.NET, SFLUG.COM, SFLUG, ORG, SF-LUG.COM, SF-LUG.ORG: Re: SFLUG.COM Re: SFLUG.[...] Re: SFLUG.org

[Rick Moen]

Quoting Michael Paoli (Michael.Paoli at cal.berkeley.edu):

> Uhm, are we done adding domains for a while now, or ... are we gonna pick up
> yet more?  SF-LUG.NET also seems available, but I don't know that Jim
> specifically suggested that ... nor up to how many domains he's willing
> to be reimbursing folks for.

Well, that's an issue going forward, isn't it?  For now, I'm going to
infer a desire for slave nameservice from my two nameservers for...

> Anyway, master now available for not only sflug.org.
> but also now sflug.com. and sflug.net.:
> ns1.sf-lug.org.:
> 198.144.194.238
> 2001:470:1f04:19e::2
> Not sure where the slaves may be in the process.
> Rick - if you want to coordinate with Al, you do also have access to
> edit those zone masters:
> balug-sf-lug-v2.balug.org

[snip]

Looks like Al (I assume) has gone ahead and declared authoritative the
usual gang of nameservers:

Liten-Datamaskin:~ rick$ whois sflug.net | grep 'Name Server'
   Name Server: NS.PRIMATE.NET
   Name Server: NS1.LINUXMAFIA.COM
   Name Server: NS1.SF-LUG.ORG
   Name Server: NS1.SVLUG.ORG
Name Server: NS.PRIMATE.NET
Name Server: NS1.LINUXMAFIA.COM
Name Server: NS1.SVLUG.ORG
Name Server: NS1.SF-LUG.ORG
Liten-Datamaskin:~ rick$ whois sflug.com | grep 'Name Server'
   Name Server: NS.PRIMATE.NET
   Name Server: NS1.LINUXMAFIA.COM
   Name Server: NS1.SF-LUG.ORG
   Name Server: NS1.SVLUG.ORG
Name Server: NS.PRIMATE.NET
Name Server: NS1.LINUXMAFIA.COM
Name Server: NS1.SVLUG.ORG
Name Server: NS1.SF-LUG.ORG
Liten-Datamaskin:~ rick$

Checking at the master:

Liten-Datamaskin:~ rick$ dig -t soa sflug.net @NS1.SF-LUG.ORG +short
ns1.sflug.net. jim.well.com. 1555254673 10800 3600 1209600 86400
Liten-Datamaskin:~ rick$ dig -t soa sflug.com @NS1.SF-LUG.ORG +short
ns1.sflug.com. jim.well.com. 1555254672 10800 3600 1209600 86400
Liten-Datamaskin:~ rick$

Notice that the FQDN of the master nameserver cited in the SOA record
('ns1.sflug.net', 'ns1.sflug.com') is a mismatch compared to the
parent-zone NS record FQDN ('NS1.SF-LUG.ORG') -- but this is admittedly
a very minor problem.

Neither of these two is yet set up at my two nameservers.  We'll do 
that now.  Adding slave nameservice on offered nameserver 1 of 2,
ns1.linuxmafia.com:

[Snip my adding two new stanzas to /etc/bind/named.conf.local.  Then:]

linuxmafia:/etc/bind# rndc reconfig
linuxmafia:/etc/bind# dig -t soa sflug.net @ns1.linuxmafia.com +short
ns1.sflug.net. jim.well.com. 1555254673 10800 3600 1209600 86400
linuxmafia:/etc/bind# dig -t soa sflug.com @ns1.linuxmafia.com +short
ns1.sflug.com. jim.well.com. 1555254672 10800 3600 1209600 86400
linuxmafia:/etc/bind#

Confirmed functional.

Moving on to configurating slave nameservice on offered nameserver 
2 of 2, ns1.svlug.org, where it's NSD rather than BIND

rick at gruyere:~$ sudo su -
[sudo] password for rick:
root at gruyere:~ # cd /etc/nsd3
root at gruyere:/etc/nsd3

[Snip my adding two new stanzas to /etc/nsd3/nsd.conf.  Then:]
  
root at gruyere:/etc/nsd3 # nsdc restart
root at gruyere:/etc/nsd3 # nsd-xfer -z sflug.net -f secondary/sflug.net.zone 198.144.194.238
[1555575378] nsd-xfer[23460]: info: send AXFR query to 198.144.194.238 for sflug.net.
root at gruyere:/etc/nsd3 # nsd-xfer -z sflug.com -f secondary/sflug.com.zone 198.144.194.238
[1555575396] nsd-xfer[23467]: info: send AXFR query to 198.144.194.238 for sflug.com.
root at gruyere:/etc/nsd3 # chown nsd:nsd secondary/sflug.net.zone secondary/sflug.com.zone
root at gruyere:/etc/nsd3 # nsdc rebuild
root at gruyere:/etc/nsd3 # dig -t soa sflug.net @ns1.svlug.org +short
ns1.sflug.net. jim.well.com. 1555254673 10800 3600 1209600 86400
root at gruyere:/etc/nsd3 # dig -t soa sflug.com @ns1.svlug.org +short
ns1.sflug.com. jim.well.com. 1555254672 10800 3600 1209600 86400
root at gruyere:/etc/nsd3 #

Confirmed functional.


You'll bug Aaron Porter about adding slave nameservice for sflug.net and
sflug.com to ns.primate.net, right?  It's not serving those, yet.


AFAIK, I'm done as to my part(s).