[sf-lug] And then there were 5: SFLUG.NET, SFLUG.COM, SFLUG, ORG, SF-LUG.COM, SF-LUG.ORG: Re: SFLUG.COM Re: SFLUG.[...] Re: SFLUG.org
Michael Paoli
Michael.Paoli at cal.berkeley.edu
Sat Apr 13 09:47:54 PDT 2019
- Previous message: [sf-lug] sudo, sysadmin, ... Re: And then there were 5: SFLUG.NET, SFLUG.COM, SFLUG, ORG, SF-LUG.COM, SF-LUG.ORG: Re: SFLUG.COM Re: SFLUG.[...] Re: SFLUG.org
- Next message: [sf-lug] And then there were 5: SFLUG.NET, SFLUG.COM, SFLUG, ORG, SF-LUG.COM, SF-LUG.ORG: Re: SFLUG.COM Re: SFLUG.[...] Re: SFLUG.org
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
> From: "Rick Moen" <rick at linuxmafia.com>
> Subject: Re: [sf-lug] And then there were 5: SFLUG.NET, SFLUG.COM,
> SFLUG, ORG, SF-LUG.COM, SF-LUG.ORG: Re: SFLUG.COM Re: SFLUG.[...]
> Re: SFLUG.org
> Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2019 01:49:52 -0700
> Quoting Michael Paoli (Michael.Paoli at cal.berkeley.edu):
>
>> Uhm, are we done adding domains for a while now, or ... are we gonna pick up
>> yet more? SF-LUG.NET also seems available, but I don't know that Jim
>> specifically suggested that ... nor up to how many domains he's willing
>> to be reimbursing folks for.
>
> As you say, the really relevant datum is which ones people are willing
> to shell out for.
Yep, ... for groups/organizations/clubs/[L]UGs and the like, often boils
down to those that:
o pay for what needs be paid for
o do the "work" that needs be done
o additionally and/or otherwise usefully contribute
There's a whole lot 'o granularity 'n stuff within that, but them's 'da
basics.
- Previous message: [sf-lug] sudo, sysadmin, ... Re: And then there were 5: SFLUG.NET, SFLUG.COM, SFLUG, ORG, SF-LUG.COM, SF-LUG.ORG: Re: SFLUG.COM Re: SFLUG.[...] Re: SFLUG.org
- Next message: [sf-lug] And then there were 5: SFLUG.NET, SFLUG.COM, SFLUG, ORG, SF-LUG.COM, SF-LUG.ORG: Re: SFLUG.COM Re: SFLUG.[...] Re: SFLUG.org
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
More information about the sf-lug
mailing list