[sf-lug] [1.1.1.1]

[Rick Moen]

Quoting Daniel Gimpelevich (daniel at gimpelevich.san-francisco.ca.us):

> Yeah, well, one of the people to whom I said this replied to the effect
> of "That would be nice, but I have to use an ISP that filters outgoing
> traffic on port 53 to servers other than theirs."

That would _so very_ be a dealbreaker for me.   I'd be wondering why
they feel they must force me to use ISP recursive nameservers, which
tend to be slow, unreliable, and very insecure.

If somehow stuck using such a sucky and suspect vendor, I would also
certainly start using VPN services immediately, which would get around
that problem.