[sf-lug] SF-LUG website (& editing thereof) [was: Re: Noisebridge SF-LUG (Noisebridge Linux discussion supported by SF-LUG, ...)]

[jim]

i

The sf-lug web site is now different, possibly better:
http://www.sf-lug.org/

:wq


On 07/16/2016 09:35 AM, Rick Moen wrote:
> Quoting Michael Paoli (Michael.Paoli at cal.berkeley.edu):
>
>> Fixing some (mis-)quoting and rearranging a bit:
>>
>> Uhm, well, no shortage of rather to quite out-of-date information on
>> https://www.sf-lug.org/
>>
>> Let's see ...
>> at least it shows correct date for meeting ... but I think also that's
>> still PHP, and I believe Jim quite expressed a preference to get away
>> from using PHP - certainly at least for publicly accessible web pages
>> ... and instead have a "static" web page ... that would be suitably
>> updated via a cron(8) driven crontab(1) job.
> This is my strong preference, as you know.
>
> PHP is a large security hole that happens to have a small interpreted
> language interpreter attached to it.
>
>> What else have we ...
>> "meetings are the" ... hmmm, always?, no mention of exceptions, or
>> qualifying it with "generally"?
>> "Meetings are usually in San Francisco at" ...
>> Uhm, has SF-LUG *ever* met outside of San Francisco?
>> If SF-LUG has *never* met outside of San Francisco, then perhaps rather
>> use:
>> "Meetings are in San Francisco usually at" ...
>> "gnu" - shouldn't it be uppercase in that context?
>> ... "Solaris"?  Uhm, really?  How often/frequently/recently has Solaris
>> been discussed at an SF-LUG meeting? ... and like in a serious, rather
>> than mocking or mostly/entirely historical context?
>> "Policies: Anything goes" ...
>> "Job Postings: current policy is"
>> Uhm, ... shouldn't the Policies bit end with "Except:", just before the
>> "Job Postings:" portion?  Otherwise they logically conflict, ... and
>> less polite folk may go with the first, in violation of the
>> second/subsequent and conflicting.
>> "Projects include:" Uhm, yeah, I'm guestimating that listing needs a
>> fair bit of updating.
> [...]
>
> You know, if you were just to copyedit the public text to polish it up
> and fix various infelicities of wording, I doubt anyone would mind.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> sf-lug mailing list
> sf-lug at linuxmafia.com
> http://linuxmafia.com/mailman/listinfo/sf-lug
> Information about SF-LUG is at http://www.sf-lug.org/
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://linuxmafia.com/pipermail/sf-lug/attachments/20160718/11579b5e/attachment.html>