[sf-lug] resolver problem

Alex Kleider akleider at sonic.net
Wed Apr 6 12:29:16 PDT 2016

On 2016-04-06 10:23, Daniel Gimpelevich wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-04-06 at 09:44 -0700, Alex Kleider wrote:
>>   UG    0      0
>> 0
>> tun0
>>     *      UH    0      0
>> 0
>> tun0
> This is interesting, but not necessarily related. Any idea what it is?

I'm surprised you feel it's unrelated. ip range is a private one (Class II, perhaps) 
but I've never used it with this machine.  All my home networks are 
using for the lan side so I don't know where Ubuntu could 
have picked up 172.31
...but since it did, would not all routing fail?  ... and if so, how 
come some things still work?

Again, thank you for your suggestions.


More information about the sf-lug mailing list