[sf-lug] Fwd: Re: resolver problem

Dan Murphy mmdmurphy at gmail.com
Wed Apr 6 08:58:20 PDT 2016


Looks like someone stepped on the internet garden hose and things aren't
flowing so well.

On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 8:48 AM, Alex Kleider <akleider at sonic.net> wrote:

>
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Re: [sf-lug] resolver problem
> Date: 2016-04-06 08:45
> From: Alex Kleider <akleider at sonic.net>
> To: Daniel Gimpelevich <daniel at gimpelevich.san-francisco.ca.us>
>
> On 2016-04-05 20:14, Daniel Gimpelevich wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 2016-04-05 at 18:43 -0700, Alex Kleider wrote:
>>
>>> ping github.com does work
>>>
>>
>> The question was whether "ping6 github.com" works…
>>
>>
> alex at x301:~$ ping6 github.com
> unknown host
> alex at x301:~$ ping github.com
> PING github.com (192.30.252.130) 56(84) bytes of data.
> 64 bytes from github.com (192.30.252.130): icmp_seq=1 ttl=53 time=87.4 ms
> 64 bytes from github.com (192.30.252.130): icmp_seq=2 ttl=53 time=87.4 ms
> 64 bytes from github.com (192.30.252.130): icmp_seq=3 ttl=53 time=87.6 ms
> ^C
> --- github.com ping statistics ---
> 4 packets transmitted, 3 received, 25% packet loss, time 3004ms
> rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 87.419/87.500/87.632/0.094 ms
>
> Aha!  What can we conclude from this?
>
> _______________________________________________
> sf-lug mailing list
> sf-lug at linuxmafia.com
> http://linuxmafia.com/mailman/listinfo/sf-lug
> Information about SF-LUG is at http://www.sf-lug.org/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://linuxmafia.com/pipermail/sf-lug/attachments/20160406/9f2d8158/attachment.html>


More information about the sf-lug mailing list