[sf-lug] Fwd: Re: SF-LUG Linux Discussion Group - clarification needed

[jim]

     SF-LUG has no president or officers. It's
an ad hoc group to promote the use of Linux
and open source products as well as to provide
support for users having problems.



On 02/02/2016 11:16 AM, Michael Paoli wrote:
> And so that the list may know (so perhaps Joseph Puig doesn't get the 
> same questions
> about 314 times, or about 314 folks wondering
> http://linuxmafia.com/pipermail/sf-lug/2016q1/011627.html
> )
>
> ----- Forwarded message from jbpuig at sbcglobal.net -----
>     Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2016 06:20:51 +0000 (UTC)
>     From: "Joseph Puig" <jbpuig at sbcglobal.net>
> Reply-To: "Joseph Puig" <jbpuig at sbcglobal.net>
>  Subject: Re: [sf-lug] SF-LUG Linux Discussion Group - clarification 
> needed
>       To: "Michael Paoli" <Michael.Paoli at cal.berkeley.edu>
>
> The San Francisco Linux Users Group hosts a meeting called the Linux 
> Discussion Group at the Noisebridge facility, which is located at 2169 
> Mission Street in San Francisco (37.762414, -122.419123), on Wednesday 
> evenings from 6:00 to 8:00 p.m. PST (Thursdays 0200-0400 UTC) in the 
> Turing classroom.
>
> James Stockford, a founding member of the SF-LUG, asked me to take 
> over the sending out of meeting announcements, and when available to 
> attend, greet any new visitors that may arrive.
> Lately, my sending of the messages has been the cause of great turmoil 
> and disruption to the lists receiving them.  It was suggested that I 
> change the wording, and I mistakenly used the word "club" in my effort 
> to direct others to the authoritative source of information.
> I'm sorry for the confusion and consternation that I caused you to 
> suffer.
> Please reference the SF-LUG web page (www.sf-lug.org), or contact the 
> official currently listed at the bottom (jim at well.com).
> Sincerely,
> Joseph
>
>     On Monday, February 1, 2016 7:51 PM, Michael Paoli 
> <Michael.Paoli at cal.berkeley.edu> wrote:
>
>
>  Joseph,
>
> This isn't very clear, please provide more relevant information.
> E.g. what "club" are you speaking of?
> The Subject: would seem to imply "SF-LUG", but I don't think
> SF-LUG is generally referred to as a "club", but rather
> a LUG (Linux User Group).
>
> So, what discussions when/where of what "club"?
>
> And who's president of the club - whatever club you're referring to.
> And what web page are you referring to?  That's quite unclear since
> you give neither URL nor disambiguate of what "club" you speak.
>
> Are you president or some officer of the "club" of which you
> speak?  Or based upon what authority or information do you make
> these statements?
>
> And the web page for the mailing list you send this to has no
> mention of "club".  And your email address domain doesn't even
> seem to apply any particular "club" association.
> I also see no mention of "club" on http://www.sf-lug.org/
>
> Please clarify - I'm sure many would generally look at your
> message and conclude: Huh?
>
>> From: "Joseph Puig" <jbpuig at sbcglobal.net>
>> Subject: [sf-lug] SF-LUG Linux Discussion Group
>> Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2016 22:52:38 +0000 (UTC)
>
>> Please refer to the club web page or contact the club president for
>> information.
>
>
>
>
> ----- End forwarded message -----
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> sf-lug mailing list
> sf-lug at linuxmafia.com
> http://linuxmafia.com/mailman/listinfo/sf-lug
> Information about SF-LUG is at http://www.sf-lug.org/

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://linuxmafia.com/pipermail/sf-lug/attachments/20160202/24ee2148/attachment.html>