[sf-lug] sf-lug.{com,info} --> www.sf-lug.org (canonical)

[jim]

makes sense. At this point I plan not to add MX
records for the sf-lug domain names. The Mailman
facility seems sufficient.


On 01/02/2016 06:41 AM, Rick Moen wrote:
> Quoting Daniel Gimpelevich (daniel at gimpelevich.san-francisco.ca.us):
>
>> While you're doing that, can you please kindly point the MX records for
>> all the domains to linuxmafia.com? Thanx
> IMO, it would be bad for an MX for sf-lug.{com,info} to point to
> linuxmafia.com, because linuxmafia.com's MTA, as presently configured,
> would refuse mail addressed to those domains.  (I haven't been asked
> to accept it.)
>
> More generally, seems to me, a domain that doesn't process any SMTP
> mail shouldn't have MX records.  Even where harmless, it's misleading.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> sf-lug mailing list
> sf-lug at linuxmafia.com
> http://linuxmafia.com/mailman/listinfo/sf-lug
> Information about SF-LUG is at http://www.sf-lug.org/
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://linuxmafia.com/pipermail/sf-lug/attachments/20160102/5794ee46/attachment.html>