[sf-lug] sf-lug.{org,com} & Network Solutions / Web.com

[jim]

both sf-lug.com and sf-lug.org are registered.

Thank you for pitching in. I was out of town
this last week and a day and have just gone
through the 2000+ waiting emails, saving the
sf-lug best for last, It'll take me some time
to read everything in the sf-lug.{com,org}
threads along with doing all the waiting
chores.

more thanks, I'll likely respond with brief
comments and questions as I read and think.




On 07/10/2015 01:16 AM, German González wrote:
>
> Thank you very much Asheesh! What you did is awesome!
>
> Enviado desde mi móvil
>
> On Jul 9, 2015 6:06 PM, "Asheesh Laroia" <asheesh at sandstorm.io 
> <mailto:asheesh at sandstorm.io>> wrote:
>
>     Hi everyone,
>
>     I called Network Solutions, waited on hold for half an hour, on
>     and off, and then got both domains into good shape without paying
>     anyone anything. I think the customer service people who helped me
>     out went above and beyond what they would normally do, so I'm
>     hesitant to say a lot more in writing, but basically some people
>     are surprisingly helpful. I can talk more in person.
>
>     So anyway, if you check the WHOIS, all should be well. Here's my
>     summary:
>
>     ➜  ~  whois sf-lug.org <http://sf-lug.org> | grep Jim
>     Admin Name:Jim Stockford
>     Tech Name:Jim Stockford
>
>     ➜  ~  whois sf-lug.com <http://sf-lug.com> | grep Jim
>     Admin Name: Stockford, Jim
>     Tech Name: Stockford, Jim
>
>
>     I'm happy to share details in person with people. Thanks for
>     bringing the issue to the group's attention and for all the info,
>     everyone!
>
>     On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 2:56 PM, Rick Moen <rick at linuxmafia.com
>     <mailto:rick at linuxmafia.com>> wrote:
>
>         Quoting Daniel Gimpelevich
>         (daniel at gimpelevich.san-francisco.ca.us
>         <mailto:daniel at gimpelevich.san-francisco.ca.us>):
>
>         > I'm pretty sure Jim stated that sf-lug.com
>         <http://sf-lug.com> is canonical.
>
>         I'm pretty sure he did.
>
>         Just a datum to consider:  In my experience, strangers
>         guessing at an
>         organisation's domain name will tend to guess .org first when the
>         organisation is a Linux user group.
>
>
>         _______________________________________________
>         sf-lug mailing list
>         sf-lug at linuxmafia.com <mailto:sf-lug at linuxmafia.com>
>         http://linuxmafia.com/mailman/listinfo/sf-lug
>         Information about SF-LUG is at http://www.sf-lug.org/
>
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     sf-lug mailing list
>     sf-lug at linuxmafia.com <mailto:sf-lug at linuxmafia.com>
>     http://linuxmafia.com/mailman/listinfo/sf-lug
>     Information about SF-LUG is at http://www.sf-lug.org/
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> sf-lug mailing list
> sf-lug at linuxmafia.com
> http://linuxmafia.com/mailman/listinfo/sf-lug
> Information about SF-LUG is at http://www.sf-lug.org/

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://linuxmafia.com/pipermail/sf-lug/attachments/20150714/24bd93da/attachment.html>