[sf-lug] sf-lug.{org,com} & Network Solutions / Web.com

[Michael Paoli]

> From: "Daniel Gimpelevich" <daniel at gimpelevich.san-francisco.ca.us>
> Subject: Re: [sf-lug] sf-lug.{org,com} & Network Solutions / Web.com
> Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2015 08:30:44 -0700

> I'm pretty sure Jim stated that sf-lug.com is canonical.

Very possible, but I don't recall such - might've been something I
missed (lots of sf-lug list emails I've not yet read, and may never
manage to get around to reading).

If anyone wants to point out an archived list item from Jim that
says that, certainly feel free to do so ... or ... I'd expect we may
hear it from Jim in well under 68 days.

Anyway, thanks for mentioning - you may be 100% correct on that and I
may be mistaken in my guestimation (and/or recall) on that, or I may have
missed earlier statement made.

Hmmm, I guess too, at present, good thing the list address isn't:
sf-lug@[lists.]sf-lug.{com,org}
Had been deferring those suggested changes pending registrar transfer,
before resuming more typical DNS updates again.