[sf-lug] SF-LUG & BALUG: System OS upgrades *soon*(?) - volunteer(s)?

jim jim at well.com
Mon Jan 23 23:31:30 PST 2012

(sigh) I'm sure you did explain. That it wasn't bought 
could be 
* "i read it three times and still don't know what 
  he means"--a problem with the reader or the writer 
  or both? 
* "we don't do things that way here". 
* "yeah, i get it, but i've got my (other) reasons."
* ...(more possibilities, I'm sure)... 

    I've lost track. I'll have to re-read the thread 
to figure out the issue. 

On Mon, 2012-01-23 at 22:28 -0800, Rick Moen wrote:
> Quoting jim (jim at systemateka.com):
> >     Say what you will; i say michael is expert, a 
> > whiz, even. 
> {shrug}
> Your 'expert Linux sys admin with particularly good set of best
> practices' was instrumental in getting the vicki host into its present
> difficulties by applying one of his 'particularly good set of best
> practices' that I specifically warned against, and explained why,
> back in '07 -- and, I could swear, a number of other times.  I'm not
> arguing with your opinion; I just note the coincidence.
> _______________________________________________
> sf-lug mailing list
> sf-lug at linuxmafia.com
> http://linuxmafia.com/mailman/listinfo/sf-lug
> Information about SF-LUG is at http://www.sf-lug.org/

More information about the sf-lug mailing list