[sf-lug] Installed OpenWRT on WRT54GS v1.0 - sweet! :-)
rjdampho at gmail.com
Tue Jan 26 13:12:27 PST 2010
I haven't tried Gargoyle, but it looks promising. Particularly the port
forwarding configuration screen. I feel that port forwarding configuration
is a good litmus test for usability - a test that X-Wrt definitely does not
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 10:47 AM, David Rosenstrauch <darose at darose.net>wrote:
> On 01/26/2010 08:37 AM, Robert Damphousse wrote:
>> Re: David, Yes DD-WRT has a more user-friendly interface. I agree that
>> OpenWrt (and the add-on interface X-Wrt) aren't very user-friendly for
>> who don't have some linux networking know-how.
>> That said, I do use OpenWrt because I have found it to be far more stable
>> than DD-WRT. OpenWrt is much more "community" developed than DD-WRT
>> is heavily managed by "brainslayer"). I am also turned away by the
>> copyright issues that Rick mentions. Some more reading on that can be
> Tomato has a very nice UI, probably the best I've seen. It has some handy
>> network tools in it.
> Thanks much for the helpful info, Robert!
> Just wondering also if you've had any experience and/or impressions about
> the Gargoyle front-end to OpenWrt. It looks pretty attractive, but I'm
> wondering how good it is in terms of functionality & usability.
> sf-lug mailing list
> sf-lug at linuxmafia.com
> Information about SF-LUG is at http://www.sf-lug.org/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the sf-lug