[sf-lug] observations of spam

[John Lowry]

I also get spam where time stamp is 2038. I think the idea is that a lot 
of free web based mail services show email in order of reception so 
emails with a timestamp that are newer will be shown at the top of the list.

jim wrote:
>    wrt spam timestamps, i've notice two things recently 
> (last 12 or 18 months): 
> * spam tends to come in clumps 
> * some spam timestamps claim the years 2000 or 1969 
> or some very early such. 
> 
>    anybody got comments? 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> sf-lug mailing list
> sf-lug at linuxmafia.com
> http://linuxmafia.com/mailman/listinfo/sf-lug