[sf-lug] sf-lug policies -- results

[jim stockford]

    the -1 faction rules (13 to 8), and, seems to me,
with thoughtful arguments to bolster their numbers.
    game over.
    i'll let the google person know.
jim



On Feb 16, 2008, at 10:15 AM, jim stockford wrote:

>
>     every once in a rare while the topic of sf-lug policies
> comes up, and here it is again. this time it's the policy
> for job postings.
>
>     the current policy is to allow job postings if the
> postings include job title, city location, and some
> indication of salary (at least a lowest figure) along with
> a brief and to-the-point description of the job and skills
> required and company benefits and contact info (with
> a proscription against hyperbole).
>     the basis for this is to present appropriate job
> opportunities that we might otherwise miss but to
> avoid subjecting the list to "bottom feeders" and
> cheapskate employers.
>
>     someone at google wants to place job postings, but
> her manager won't allow any salary info. the default is
> to disallow this posting. the reason for raising review
> of this policy is that google is an established, local
> workplace, and can reasonably be considered not a
> bottom-feeder or cheapskate employer.
>
>
>     please vote:
>
> +1 means change policy to allow known job postings of
> known good employers regardless of salary information.
>
> -1 means do not change the policy.
>
> after summing votes, a positive number will effect a
> change in policy. a zero or negative number will have
> the effect that policy remains as is (and the google
> submissions and those similar will not be posted to our
> email list).
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> sf-lug mailing list
> sf-lug at linuxmafia.com
> http://linuxmafia.com/mailman/listinfo/sf-lug
>