[sf-lug] Why PcLinuxOS and Ubuntu failed to work on Emmanuel's laptop
Matt Price
matt.price at utoronto.ca
Wed Dec 19 18:19:39 PST 2007
On Wed, 2007-12-19 at 17:23 -0800, Asheesh Laroia wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Dec 2007, Matt Price wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 2007-12-18 at 14:27 -0800, Asheesh Laroia wrote:
> >> On Tue, 18 Dec 2007, Kristian Erik Hermansen wrote:
> >>
> >>> We did. We wrote it all down on a sheet of paper so that he wouldn't
> >>> get confused by all the details either. Asheesh wrote down some other
> >>> stuff on the paper on the way out of the cafe, but I didn't catch what
> >>> he put on there...
> >>
> >> I wrote that he should look for Rick Moen's installfest as another
> >> group of experts, in case he needed some advice/help while I, at least,
> >> am away for Christmas.
> >>
> >> By the way, I was pretty unhappy with what I saw of PC Linux OS, if
> >> that's the distro that was on there before, and wouldn't really
> >> recommend it to anyone. The package quality was *rather* poor, even
> >> for RPM distro standards.
> >>
> > how did you evaluate the package quality? were there dependency
> > problems, or lousy desktop integration?
>
> Lousy desktop integration, plus the daemon I installed (NetworkManager)
> didn't start itself at package install time, plus there was no
> documentation on the system-specific way to use it in either
> /usr/share/doc/networkmanager/ or /usr/share/doc/knetworkmanager/ .
>
well, those are pretty convincing!
matt
> -- Asheesh.
>
> --
> "Stupidity, like virtue, is its own reward"
> -- William E. Davidsen
>
> _______________________________________________
> sf-lug mailing list
> sf-lug at linuxmafia.com
> http://linuxmafia.com/mailman/listinfo/sf-lug
--
Matt Price
matt.price at utoronto.ca
More information about the sf-lug
mailing list