[sf-lug] [Balug-Talk] license count != software popularity (Re: Open Source less popular than Free Software)
embeddedlinuxguy at gmail.com
Wed Sep 26 12:17:31 PDT 2007
On 9/26/07, Asheesh Laroia <asheesh at asheesh.org> wrote:
Yes, this points to "problems created by license proliferation". I
think the FSF encourages the use of GPL wherever possible.
> any notes on the main FSF or GNU sites that indicate that they think
> license proliferation is bad.
"The mere proliferation of different free software licenses is a
burden in and of itself."
- GPL FAQ, http://www.fsf.org/licensing/licenses/gpl-faq.html
"The proliferation of different free software licenses means increased
work for users in understanding the licenses"
- FSF License list, http://www.fsf.org/licensing/licenses/
google turns up many more examples.
> If you count the organizations making licenses, then it's at least true to
> say that more organizations use licenses
How many organizations "make" licenses is irrelevant to how many "use"
them. License making may seem like a glamorous high-profile activity,
but it's for the most part pretty unhelpful, and how many
organizations do it is generally of little concern to the
Free/Libre/Open Source Software community.
> that are exclusively Free
> Software rather than ones that are exclusively Open Source.
A license is "Open Source" if it meets the "Open Source Definition",
whether it is OSI-approved or not (IMO). I would be very interested
if you can find (or write) a specific license which meets the "Free
Software Definition" but not the OSD, or vice versa. I can't find
much concrete difference other than rhetoric.
More information about the sf-lug