[sf-lug] installfest Sat. @ Rick Moen's in Menlo Park/ Xandros response
alamozzz at yahoo.com
Tue Jul 11 12:59:03 PDT 2006
So is Ruby! And it is still possible to write bad code with either of them.
jim stockford <jim at well.com> wrote:
yes! objective C is clean and good!
On Jul 11, 2006, at 9:39 AM, Rick Moen wrote:
> Quoting jim stockford (jim at well.com):
>> The promise that once debugged, underlying class code
>> need not be re-debugged as one develops classes turned
>> out to be sometimes mistaken.
>> For MSFT Visual C++ at least, the virtual table mechanism
>> allows occasional corruption of resources.
>> Multiple inheritance is scary on the face of it, at least to me.
>> Pointedly, the remark is about the risks of the underlying
>> classes' behavior, not code readability or the skill of any
>> particular programmer.
> My wife likes to say that inheritance means you can inherit bugs (too).
> The thing about C++ is that (along with Java) it's about the worst
> possible advertisement for OO programming (in my view), and I never
> liked that language category until I encountered better examples. In
> particular, it's a darned shame that Ojective C never caught on instead
> of C++; the world would be a much better place.
> sf-lug mailing list
> sf-lug at linuxmafia.com
sf-lug mailing list
sf-lug at linuxmafia.com
Yahoo! Music Unlimited - Access over 1 million songs.Try it free.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the sf-lug