[conspire] spf and relay

[Ron]

Ivan Sergio Borgonovo wrote on 2025-03-14 15:00:

> To summarize... just the "last mile" is checked.
> If the server delivering at the boundary of the recipient match the spf 
> record that's fine and enough.
> 
> Did I get it right?

That's my understanding.


You'd mentioned things were working well prior to having a static IP, so 
I expect there was no SPF pointing at your ever-changing home IP.


Which got me thinking, SPF is probably *not* required due to a stanza on 
their Postfix similar to this:

smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
     ## Accept valid logins:
     permit_sasl_authenticated
     ## Accept networks I trust:
     permit_mynetworks
     ## We're only accepting for $mydestination, $virtual_alias_domains,
     ## $virtual_mailbox_domains, $proxy_interfaces,
     ## and $inet_interfaces:
     ## https://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#reject_unauth_destination
     reject_unauth_destination
     ## greylist -- config to work with chroot'd postfix:
     check_policy_service unix:postgrey.sock
     ##
     ## Check incoming mail servers' SPF records:
     ## https://www.linuxbabe.com/mail-server/setting-up-dkim-and-spf
     #
     check_policy_service unix:private/policyd-spf


What's happening above is:

Q) Is user authenticated? If so, accept the message
...
Q) Is user connecting from a host with valid SPF record? If so, accept



I suspect the SASL is good enough and precludes SPF checking.