[conspire] AT&T and CPUC
Ron / BCLUG
admin at bclug.ca
Thu Jan 25 15:13:56 PST 2024
Rick Moen wrote on 2024-01-24 21:18:
> the relevant question is "Was PG&E (for most of the state) or
> Southern California Edison (for SoCal) willing to pay to underground
> the utility cables?"
> Everyone talks about undergrounding all utilities -- especially the
> long-distrance power transmission lines that cause many wildfires --
> but nobody has ever wanted to pay for that.
I'm sympathetic to that argument.
The terrain, the ground / soil is likely not amenable to burying, the
environmental damage, difficulty of inspection (not that PG&E do that),...
And now I hear that where utilities *were* buried, there was often
leaching of lead, etc. into the soil (AT&T?).
Freakin' great.
I cannot think of a single example of a fire caused by utility lines
here in BC. We've got ~300,000km if I recall correctly, and a lot of
increasingly dry & dead forests, yet it isn't (yet?) a problem.
Probably those inspections, plus no profit motive.
Recently listened to a horrifying podcast about the Paradise / Camp fire.
I don't recall the name of it, but it was riveting.
More information about the conspire
mailing list